Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 12/15/12 22:41 CST: > Randy McMurchy wrote: >> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 12/15/12 22:29 CST: >>> The glibc folks left it out for a couple of versions and then put it >>> back after a lot of complaints. LFS 7.1 had the problem of leaving it out. >> Which means the text in the BLFS book should be modified ever so slightly. > > Which text? > > Would > > s/later/2.15/ > > do it? If so, I'd make the change without a change log entry. I don't > think really minor changes need log entries.
It is the opposite. The book says that versions *later* than (whatever is there now) does not include it. However, 2.16 *does* include it. So, the text as is, needs to be modified so that it reflects the Glibc versions that do not include the header file. Current Glibc *does* include it. I can fix it if you like. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 22:45:00 up 10 days, 8:44, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.04, 0.05 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
