Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 12/15/12 22:41 CST: >> Randy McMurchy wrote: >>> Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 12/15/12 22:29 CST: >>>> The glibc folks left it out for a couple of versions and then put it >>>> back after a lot of complaints. LFS 7.1 had the problem of leaving it out. >>> Which means the text in the BLFS book should be modified ever so slightly. >> >> Which text? >> >> Would >> >> s/later/2.15/ >> >> do it? If so, I'd make the change without a change log entry. I don't >> think really minor changes need log entries. > > It is the opposite. The book says that versions *later* than (whatever is > there > now) does not include it. However, 2.16 *does* include it. So, the text as is, > needs to be modified so that it reflects the Glibc versions that do not > include > the header file. Current Glibc *does* include it. I can fix it if you like.
That's what I thought I said. The wording should be: Glibc-2.14 and 2.15 do not install NIS and RPC... Or something like that. Go ahead and fix it. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
