Armin K. wrote: > A systemd blfs branch would be fine since we already have systemd lfs > branch.
Do you want to create it or do you want me to do it? Either way is OK. > There is no need to reference it anywhere on the main site - > just an initial announcement should be fine. OK. We can always adjust the site as needed. > As for the GNOME, I think that 3.8 could be made to work without systemd > (minus some functionality - not sure which one) but as I said, I am > systemd user and I am not going to put the effort into making packages > that depend on systemd work without it. I've never liked GNOME, but use some of the apps. I used to use KDE, but the later versions seemed klunky and bloated. I now use xfce with a few kde apps and an occasional gmome app. > I can still maintain both of BLFS branches like Matt does for LFS and > LFS Systemd (merging changes that don't conflict with other ones), but > some help is always welcome - there are packages out of date that I > don't or won't maintain (not using them or such). I prefer working from the Trac tickets. I don't see much there that I use regularly, but I can do some of those. If there are additional tickets created I can probably work some of those. I may create some scripts to check the latest packages for at least some of the packages in BLFS similar to the one in LFS that I just did. Perhaps a script for each Part (12 scripts) may be useful. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
