Em 16-07-2013 10:17, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Tests apparently broke again, at the same point (more than 1 hour without moving from it):
$ tail OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.1-2013.07.16-08h42m30s-copy-to-delete.log FAILED: java/awt/Frame/FrameSize/TestFrameSize.java Passed: java/awt/Frame/HideMaximized/HideMaximized.java java.awt.event.WindowEvent[WINDOW_CLOSED,opposite=null,oldState=0,newState=0] on frame41 Passed: java/awt/Frame/HugeFrame/HugeFrame.java FAILED: java/awt/Frame/InvisibleOwner/InvisibleOwner.java Passed: java/awt/Frame/LayoutOnMaximizeTest/LayoutOnMaximizeTest.java FAILED: java/awt/Frame/ResizeAfterSetFont/ResizeAfterSetFont.java FAILED: java/awt/Frame/WindowDragTest/WindowDragTest.java FAILED: java/awt/FullScreen/FullScreenInsets/FullScreenInsets.java Passed: java/awt/FullScreen/NoResizeEventOnDMChangeTest/NoResizeEventOnDMChangeTest.java (Last line, starting with "Passed:", will probably appear split in the mail sent.) Re-running according to DJ's mail: # Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK Test failures # Em 06-06-2012 13:13, DJ Lucas escreveu Also: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> On 08-06-2012 03:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:> I was able to build and test >> openjdk. The results are OK, but I'm >>> disappointed in the number of issues that are not addressed upstream. >>> >>> I used: >>> >>> #!/bin/bash >>> >>> export DISPLAY=:20 >>> Xvfb :20 -screen 0 1x1x24 -ac& >>> echo $!> Xvfb.pid >>> make jtregcheck -k 2>jdktest-errs |tee jdktest >>> kill -9 `cat Xvfb.pid` >>> unset DISPLAY >>> rm -f Xvfb.pid >> >> Don't you and/or DJ think these lines could be in the page? > > Yes, I think they are useful, but I was waiting for DJ to have some time > to discuss. > Do not know. At the moment, I would be inclined to state "Tests are broken", if they break again. But would add those lines, even if commented, for future use. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
