Em 27-08-2013 14:44, David Brodie escreveu: > On 27/08/13 16:33, David Brodie wrote: >> >> >> On 27/08/13 14:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> David Brodie wrote: >>>> On 27/08/13 05:29, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>>>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>>>>> Em 26-08-2013 23:58, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >>>>>>> Tests attached. >>>>> >>>>> Well... >>>>> >>>>> ## 417 tests 15:24 : 78 OK, 2 warnings, 20 failures, 0 known failures; >>>>> 317 skipped >>>>> >>>>> doesn't seem very useful. You start out with Running >>>>> normal:api/lvtest.sh ... passed. >>>>> 0:02 0:00.159/0:00.699 14 4536/1448 >>>>> >>>>> But that's what hangs for me. >>>>> >>>>> I notice later it says: >>>>> >>>>> kernel_at_least 2 6 33 || skip, but I suspect it doesn't take into >>>>> account version 3 of the kernel. Also, there are comments about udev. >>>>> >>>>> Finally, I see snapshot support for the kernel seems to be needed. >>>>> >>>>> Overall, the log does not make much sense to me. >>>> >>>> The errors look similar to the results I got when running the tests >>>> under a 3.9.7 kernel, but with LVM built using 3.8.1 headers - perhaps >>>> the API has changed? >>> >>> What would change that the tests hang/fail, but the commands seem to >>> work fine? I suspect the problem to be something about the test harness. >>> >>> -- Bruce >> >> Well I've tried creating some lv's from the command line under linux >> 3.9.7 (lvm 2.02.98 built with 3.8.1 headers), and the results are >> consistent with the test suite, i.e. I can create plain vanilla lv's, >> but not with --type=raid/snapshot/mirror, which all give kernel target >> not found errors. >> >> I can also create a plain lv on a vg consisting of 3 loopback volumes, >> and format, mount, copy files. >> >> Ah, just checked /usr/lib/modules/3.9.7/modules.alias - it's grown >> considerably since 3.8.1, and has a whole lot of aliases such as: >> >> alias dm-snapshot-merge dm_snapshot >> alias dm-snapshot-origin dm_snapshot >> alias dm-raid6 dm_raid >> alias dm-raid5 dm_raid >> >> and so on. Wonder if this has something to do with it? lvm2 seems to >> think that the kernel target is missing, perhaps it has just changed >> name, and lvm2 isn't checking the alias file. >> >> David >> > > No, forget that, the difference is I've built the targets as modules for > 3.9.7 - they just need loading with 'modprobe'. Anyway, that should > solve Fernando's problem. > > David >
David, Thank you very much. Unfortunately, I could not consider these tests, nor anything else, these days, with that other problem (glibc). Sorry for not replying before. In time, I will test it again. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
