> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:21:19 +0000 > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Proposal of patch to correct bad URL > > > Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:15:41 +0100 > > From: Denis Mugnier <myo...@orange.fr> > > To: blfs Dev ml <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > > Subject: [blfs-dev] Proposal of patch to correct bad URL > > > > Hi, > > > > For the french translation of BLFS, I check the URLs in the book. > > I found some bad URL, so I propose a patch to correct it. > > > . > . > > <xref linkend="gtk-doc"/> and > > - <ulink url="http://go-mono.com/sources/";>Gtk#</ulink> (requires > > + <ulink > > url="http://http://download.mono-project.com/sources/";>Gtk#</ulink> > > (requires > > > - double-protocol in url. > > > > > . > . > > - > > url='http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/usernames.html'> > > + > > url='http://http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/usernames.html'> > > Linux Standard Base</ulink> recommends that system uid and gid > > > - double-protocol in url. >
Do you automate the testing of the book's urls for brokenness: would have caught the (apparent) errors in the patch; and save a lot of manual work in the medium-/long- term. Not sure if Bruce's test-for-updates cron script would incorporate test-for-brokenness, or if you have access to that. > > > rgds, > akiezer > > > > > > -- > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
