Em 17-02-2014 14:34, Pierre Labastie escreveu: > I do not know the icedtea installer, so I do not know how > it gets its information about the LSB. But I think the best > would be to consider that everything, which is in LFS, is installed > (including /etc/lsb-release), and that lsb-release executable is > optional. Ideally, then, the icedtea installer should be taught > not to use the executable. Now, if the executable is needed > for an easier installation of icedtea-JDK, then it should go to > recommended.
Once more: icedtea install OK without lsb_release icedtea does not install OK if lsb_release accidentally was installed, but the user did not configure it in LFS. Problem is the divide in configuring before installing, in LFS (optional), but nothing being written about configuration in BLFS. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
