Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 20-02-2014 23:00, LFS Trac escreveu: >> #3505: linux-3.13.4 >> ----------------------+------------------------ >> Reporter: bdubbs@… | Owner: lfs-book@… >> Type: task | Status: new >> Priority: normal | Milestone: 7.5 >> Component: Book | Version: SVN >> Severity: normal | Keywords: >> ----------------------+------------------------ >> New point version. >> >> We can do this for 7.5. The rule here is that we can update point >> versions but not major or minor versions. > > Couldn't it be the same for blfs, for almost all packages?
That's worthy of discussion. Perhaps end packages and not libraries would be amenable to this type of rule. I'm hesitant to update libraries right now because of possible breakages of programs already marked as lfs75_checked. For the few packages that are marked lfs75_built, then there is no good reason not to update. Is that a reasonable compromise? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
