> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:22:52 -0300 > From: Fernando de Oliveira <fam...@yahoo.com.br> > To: BLFS Development List <blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Libexec WebKitGTK [Was ... r12813 ...] > > Em 04-03-2014 02:17, Armin K. escreveu: > > . . > >> I am thinking of adding, after "make install": > >> > >> webkitgtk-2.2.4: > rm -rf /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk-2.0 > >> mv -vi /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk \ > >> /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk-2.0 > >> > >> webkitgtk-1.10.2 > rm -rf /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk-1.0 > >> mv -vi /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk \ > >> /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/webkitgtk-1.0 > >> > >> > > > > For 3. I'd suggest the same as for python docs. Since they are developer > > docs and developer should only use latest version to develop against,
No, not in the wider real-world picture: developers often maintain against two+ major-ver strands of a package; especially when the strands are very different and contain paradigm shifts (for want of a better term). Yes, they'll likely focus on the latest version within each strand; and often will only support particular strands (cf e.g. kernel LTS); but not _only_ the latest release of the latest strand. > > the docs for the latter (1.10.x) should be disabled explicitly. > > > > --disable-gtk-doc or --disable-gtk-doc-html ... Try one. > > > > To Armin: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I will keep in mind and try first > differently, will do as you suggest if the consensus is with you. :-) > > To all: > > As we have little time, what I will do is to keep them, with the > commands to remove (to prevent failure in reinstall/upgrade). And > include the reason for that in "Command Explanations", so, when removen > 1.10.x from the bokk, we can remove the commands from the other. In this > case, it is not possible to leave one as is, because both install first > the same directory. If there is a consensus supporting Armin's > suggestion, I will modify, then. > . . > > Any of the modifications above, I ask you to comment, if not agreeing, > so I will revert, if there is a consensus against me, or if any is > wrong, without problem or complaint. > > hth, akh > > -- > []s, > Fernando > -- > -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page