On 08/19/2014 07:06 PM, Igor Živković wrote: > On 08/19/2014 05:58 PM, Armin K. wrote: >> On 08/19/2014 05:24 PM, Igor Živković wrote: >>> On 08/19/2014 03:16 PM, Armin K. wrote: >>>> On 08/19/2014 12:13 PM, Igor Živković wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Right, that is now fixed, but until mesa can use python3 I don't >>>>> see the >>>>> point of mentioning it under libepoxy dependencies. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why not? It will be used instead of python2 if it's found. >>> >>> I don't see any benefit for installing python3 there when python2 >>> already pulled from the dependency chain will do identical job. >>> >> >> But it is a dependency, nonetheless. That's why it's optional. > > Useless one in my opinion, so not worth mentioning in the context of > libepoxy. >
Using the same logic, why bother mentioning python3 on the xcb-proto page when 3 pages later you are required to build python2? -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
