On 08/19/2014 07:28 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 08/19/2014 07:06 PM, Igor Živković wrote:
On 08/19/2014 05:58 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 08/19/2014 05:24 PM, Igor Živković wrote:
On 08/19/2014 03:16 PM, Armin K. wrote:
On 08/19/2014 12:13 PM, Igor Živković wrote:
Right, that is now fixed, but until mesa can use python3 I don't
see the
point of mentioning it under libepoxy dependencies.
Why not? It will be used instead of python2 if it's found.
I don't see any benefit for installing python3 there when python2
already pulled from the dependency chain will do identical job.
But it is a dependency, nonetheless. That's why it's optional.
Useless one in my opinion, so not worth mentioning in the context of
libepoxy.
Using the same logic, why bother mentioning python3 on the xcb-proto
page when 3 pages later you are required to build python2?
Probably because one can still choose not to install python2 while
building xcb-proto. Also, technically, working xorg environment can be
built without python2 if GL is not desired.
--
Igor Živković
http://www.slashtime.net/
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
