On 12-09-2014 07:29, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 11-09-2014 19:36, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:50:48AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:22:47AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>  Thanks, I'll give that a go - maybe not "tonight" (I'm trying to
>>>> catch up with two cycle races from Wednesday's TV, building texlive
>>>> (from source, with texmf) and biber - and then testing them, and
>>>> meanwhile leaving the i686 to build xorg).
>>>>
>>>  Done (the rest of lxde is still building, but it got through that
>>> part).
>>>
> 
> ĸen, thanks for testing and for the fixes to lxdm and respective bootscript.
> 
> I am having a particular problem, mentioned a couple of days ago, that
> is delaying me, only part of the morning, yesterday, was useful.
> 
> First thing I will do today is to split libfm in two pages. Will use a
> name slightly different from your suggestion: extra-only instead of
> extra, because it is less than the whole, contrary to other extras we have.
> 
>>  Just a note that I've tagged lxdm, but none of lxde - most, or all,
>> of them build and lxdm using lxde _almost_ worked as a desktop : the
>> only way to log out seemed to be to kill lxdm from a tty : it
>> asked if I wanted to leave openbox, even when I was supposedly
>> running lxde not openbox, and then hung.  So, I have removed all the
>> openbox files from /usr/share/xsession (since I do not intend to
>> build gnome or kde on this system).
> 
> You know it is very fast to build or rebuild what you got for lxde. I
> will try to build it myself, to see if I can reproduce this behaviour.
> If not, I will try to convince you to help me debug what is going on, so
> we could fix whatever necessary, because I think it is much more
> trustful other editor tag than the maintainer.
> 
>>
>>  With that, and bit of configuration, lxdm -> xfce works nicely.
>>
>>  But I do not feel willing to tag any of hte other lxde packages as
>> working.
>>
>>  Thanks again for the fix.

First part fixed: added libfm-extra at revision 14256 (after all,
preferred the name you suggested).

Now, back to build BLFS-7.6(-rc1).


-- 
[]s,
Fernando
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to