On 16-09-2014 11:04, David Brodie wrote: > On 16/09/14 12:40, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I'm sorry, I didn't realise you were waiting for me to reply, however, I > think I still stand by my original recommendation, which is based purely > on the recommendation of the developers, and a 'path of least > resistance' policy. No problem. Thanks for replying. OK, you remain thinking as before. > > I'm not aware of any specifically security-related issues, if sqlite is > linked dynamically, however, the flags are different as used by the > sqlite extension, and presumably are so for a reason. > Also, I've done a quick 'confidence' test, and the extension seems to > work perfectly well (I've only tested it statically linked), either on > the command line (sqlite3), or from tclsh. For the former, see the man > page for sqlite3, and for the latter, > http://www.sqlite.org/tclsqlite.html . Fine. I always learn many things from you. That is why I insisted. > > So, AFICS, it just provides a nice, convenient way of using an SQL > database from a command script, either bash or tclsh. > > Hope this helps, Helped a lot. I immediately modified my scrpits, removed both and reinstalled with the book's instructions. So, I was completely convinced, thanks. After Bruce's post, I started rethinking again. But will write in reply to him. -- []s, Fernando -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
