Hi,
I run into the following error when building sudo-1.8.11 on a fresh LFS 7.6:
------
libtool: link: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/sudo_auth.o .libs/getspwuid.o
.libs/passwd.o .libs/boottime.o .libs/check.o .libs/env.o .libs/find_path.o
.libs/goodpath.o .libs/group_plugin.o .libs/interfaces.o .libs/iolog.o
.libs/iolog_path.o .libs/locale.o .libs/logging.o .libs/logwrap.o
.libs/parse.o .libs/policy.o .libs/prompt.o .libs/set_perms.o .libs/sudo_nss.o
.libs/sudoers.o .libs/timestamp.o -Wl,--whole-archive
./.libs/libparsesudoers.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,-rpath
-Wl,/sources/sudo/sudo-1.8.11/lib/util/.libs -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/sudo
-lcrypt -lshadow ../../lib/util/.libs/libsudo_util.so -ldl -lz -Wl,-z
-Wl,relro -Wl,-soname -Wl,sudoers.so -o .libs/sudoers.so
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshadow
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:204: recipe for target 'sudoers.la' failed
make[2]: *** [sudoers.la] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/sudo/sudo-1.8.11/plugins/sudoers'
Makefile:89: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/sudo/sudo-1.8.11'
------
I have tried to find libshadow in /usr/lib and /lib, and found nothing.
Actually, during the build of shadow, they use libshadow.a, which is linked to
the executables, but not installed.
Looking at what changed in configure.ac, I think I found the faulty code:
-------- Note that shadow_libs_optional contains "-lshadow"
AC_CHECK_FUNCS($shadow_funcs, [found=yes])
- if test "$found" = "yes"; then
- SUDOERS_LIBS="$SUDOERS_LIBS $shadow_libs"
- elif test -n "$shadow_libs_optional"; then
+ if test "$found" = "yes" -a -n "$shadow_libs_optional"; then
LIBS="$LIBS $shadow_libs_optional"
AC_CHECK_FUNCS($shadow_funcs, [found=yes])
if test "$found" = "yes"; then
- SUDOERS_LIBS="$SUDOERS_LIBS $shadow_libs $shadow_libs_optional"
+ shadow_libs="$shadow_libs $shadow_libs_optional"
-------
So while before, $shadow_libs_optional was only added when $found was
different from "yes", now it is included when $found is equal to "yes".
Actually, the issue seems to have been corrected at:
http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/fdf06757f25d
But what amazes me is that nobody on the list has seen this yet. Is there a
possibility that some of our developpers have libshadow installed? And if so,
how?
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
