On 09/28/2014 09:36 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > Hi, > > I run into the following error when building sudo-1.8.11 on a fresh LFS 7.6: > ------ > libtool: link: gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/sudo_auth.o .libs/getspwuid.o > .libs/passwd.o .libs/boottime.o .libs/check.o .libs/env.o .libs/find_path.o > .libs/goodpath.o .libs/group_plugin.o .libs/interfaces.o .libs/iolog.o > .libs/iolog_path.o .libs/locale.o .libs/logging.o .libs/logwrap.o > .libs/parse.o .libs/policy.o .libs/prompt.o .libs/set_perms.o .libs/sudo_nss.o > .libs/sudoers.o .libs/timestamp.o -Wl,--whole-archive > ./.libs/libparsesudoers.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,-rpath > -Wl,/sources/sudo/sudo-1.8.11/lib/util/.libs -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/sudo > -lcrypt -lshadow ../../lib/util/.libs/libsudo_util.so -ldl -lz -Wl,-z > -Wl,relro -Wl,-soname -Wl,sudoers.so -o .libs/sudoers.so > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lshadow > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > Makefile:204: recipe for target 'sudoers.la' failed > make[2]: *** [sudoers.la] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/sources/sudo/sudo-1.8.11/plugins/sudoers' > Makefile:89: recipe for target 'all' failed > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/sources/sudo/sudo-1.8.11' > ------ > I have tried to find libshadow in /usr/lib and /lib, and found nothing. > Actually, during the build of shadow, they use libshadow.a, which is linked to > the executables, but not installed. > > Looking at what changed in configure.ac, I think I found the faulty code: > -------- Note that shadow_libs_optional contains "-lshadow" > AC_CHECK_FUNCS($shadow_funcs, [found=yes]) > - if test "$found" = "yes"; then > - SUDOERS_LIBS="$SUDOERS_LIBS $shadow_libs" > - elif test -n "$shadow_libs_optional"; then > + if test "$found" = "yes" -a -n "$shadow_libs_optional"; then > LIBS="$LIBS $shadow_libs_optional" > AC_CHECK_FUNCS($shadow_funcs, [found=yes]) > if test "$found" = "yes"; then > - SUDOERS_LIBS="$SUDOERS_LIBS $shadow_libs > $shadow_libs_optional" > + shadow_libs="$shadow_libs $shadow_libs_optional" > ------- > So while before, $shadow_libs_optional was only added when $found was > different from "yes", now it is included when $found is equal to "yes". > > > > Actually, the issue seems to have been corrected at: > http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/fdf06757f25d > > But what amazes me is that nobody on the list has seen this yet. Is there a > possibility that some of our developpers have libshadow installed? And if so, > how? > > Pierre >
If you build with PAM support then it's not needed, obviously. My guess is that whoeever updated the package had PAM installed, that's why the issue went undetected. So, for the time being, you can try manually copying libshadow.a from shadow build dir. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
