On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:01:37PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > >I can see some benefits to the change - on my netbook it looks good > >and has a small margin on the right of the page (with all navigation > >on the right). But on my desktop it still wastes space at the right > >in any wide window, and seems to have a hardcoded maximum usable > >line length. So no, that was not what I'm saying. > >
That should have been "with all navigation on the left". > >> > >>As Ken wrote, I read it perfectly in my tablet, netbook, notebook and > >>desktop. > >> > > > >For LFS it now looks ok. But for BLFS I have raised questions, > >quite apart from the waste of space in right margins in wide > >windows. > > I agree that at some window sizes the right margin is too big. I'm sure > there is a way to force the icons to always be on the left (or right if that > is preferable). Left is probably preferable. The right for Next is good, but only if the text in the link can be reasonably fitted in, so I suspect that always on the left should be preferred. > > The really nice thing from my perspective is that the links do not scroll > with the text. They are always visible. > > -- Bruce > Yes, I forgot to mention that - it is a real benefit. When I first looked, I was on my netbook and I thought "Mmmmm, nice, shiny." But I decided to look on my main system before sending a first reply. At the moment I have not attempted to see how it behaves in qupzilla or konqueror. I assume that links or lynx will not be altered. ĸen -- This one goes up to eleven: but only on a clear day, with the wind in the right direction. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
