On 03/10/2019 21:45, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 10/3/19 1:56 PM, Pierre Labastie via blfs-dev wrote: >> I'm going to try to become "upstream" for the standalone localed >> daemon. I think I'll take the openrc implementation rather than >> systemd, because systemd's implementation relies on a big utility >> library. >> >> Before doing anything, I need to choose a name. Of course, elocaled >> comes to mind, but adding "e" is some king of gentoo mark. Since it >> would be a blfs project, I'd rather use something else. What about >> blocaled (with b as in blfs, or Bruce, or build)? Other possibilities: >> plocaled (with p as in Pierre JK), salocaled (with sa for >> standalone)... > > sv_localed? As in System V. >
Well, it should be compatible with other init systems as well (runit for example), or rather completely independent on the init system. It's a standalone daemon, which is started by dbus on demand, and which only depends on some almost standard configuration files. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
