On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 09:49:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs via blfs-dev wrote: > On 3/22/20 9:25 PM, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > On 2020-03-23 01:44 +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:12:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > On 2020-03-22 21:34 +0000, Ken Moffat via blfs-dev wrote: > > > > > > So, you are saying that packages from mozilla should not now be > > > built in chroot ? > > > > No. I think we need a better way. > > > > > But, what do you mean by a service running in chroot ? I assume we > > > are specifically talking of systemd here ? Do services not get > > > started during the boot process ? The systemd instance in chroot > > > has never started, so I assume it will be ineffective and systemd on > > > the host will only care about services described in /etc/systemd ? > > > > Maybe that's not a issue. But still, /run contains lots of sockets of > > running > > services. That means now we can connect host services from the chroot > > environment. Even if it's not dangerous to host, it's polluting the new LFS > > system. > > > > Consider /run/initctl. We don't want something in chroot to switch the > > *host* > > to runlevel 1 :). >
As a developer, I take the view that I'll do what I want with my machine, including shooting myself in the foot :) For the book, yes, I take your point. > What about > > mount -t tmpfs /run > > from within chroot? > > -- Bruce I suspect that what is actually needed is /run/shm. Will need to do some testing and stracing. ... ĸen -- When alle is ſayed and all is done, ye must chooſe your faces wisely, for soon enouff ye will be playing with fyre." The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Prophecy 5004 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
