Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 09/06/05 14:15 CST: > Hmm, any idea on what the criteria for promoting releases of gtk+, glib, > atk and pango to ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/v2.8/ are? That's the only > place I regularly check for new releases of said packages...maybe I need > to change that, but at the very least the various LATEST-* files there > are nothing less than misleading!
Yes, it is confusing. I, like you Matt, use the versions posted on GTK.ORG. Seeing how GNOME-2.12 is due to be released tomorrow, I can't imagine anything other than ATK-1.10.1 being the "stable" version. Only if the packages recommended by the GNOME team for the current release of GNOME differs from what is posted at GTK.ORG would I even consider using that. I'm sticking with ATK-1.10.1 for now, until I see something from the GNOME team. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 14:15:01 up 157 days, 13:48, 3 users, load average: 1.48, 1.13, 0.68 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
