S. Anthony Sequeira wrote these words on 11/07/05 15:44 CST: > The SF CVS version needed a patch to include stdlib.h in one of it's files.
Hmmm... I didn't have to apply a patch last time I installed it, but then I could have patched my copy I pulled down and then created a tarball, in which case I wouldn't need the patch any longer. And since that was back in May when I created the tarball, I cannot remember if I did have to create a patch. But I take your word that you did. :-) > OK, but be aware I'm using BLFS 6.1, therefore GNOME 2.10, is it still > usefull > to you? And you'll have to bear with me. I need some sleep. I also need to > install SVN first. I'll report as soon as I can Yes, it would be useful. And there's no rush. In fact, don't install SVN just for this, unless you want to, of course. Any help would be appreciated. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 15:47:00 up 44 days, 1:11, 3 users, load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.15 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
