TheOldFellow wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:33:30 +0100 > Jeremy Henty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote: >> >>> ... the Wiki is mostly supplemental information for packages that >>> are in the book - alternative configurations, optional dependencies, >>> etc. Whereas the hints are mostly for things that just aren't >>> covered by the books at all ... >> So what should I do with the dillo and dillo2 Wiki pages (which I have >> been maintaining but did not create)? I have been trying to make the >> dillo2 page look as much like a BLFS page as possible. There was a >> suggestion in another thread that a Wiki page might be a good way to >> develop a would-be new BLFS page. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeremy Henty > > My wiki pages on Gphoto2 and QCad are similar - I have vague hopes that > they may go into the book one day. > > I think the wiki is the right place for hints today. Even if the entry > is only a pointer to a text document.
I agree. The hints preceded the wiki, but are easier for someone to create and maintain. However, there are hints that are still valid. I'd say that hints are deprecated. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
