On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:33:24PM +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > >On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:46:05 +0100 > >bendeguz <mailinglist...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The compiling runs fine, but the test fails. > > I've tried with an unpatched glibc source as well. > > I haven't updated any LFS packeges from my first build, > > just BLFS packages and the kernel (and bzip). > > Could that be a problem that I haven't updated the linux > > API headers? > > > > bendeguz > > Do NOT, under any circumstances, update the linux API headers on a > finished system. The cpp will become confused and the toolchain will > brake. My first LFS went down the drain when I made that mistake. > > As for the glibc test mistakes.. Well, what are they? > If you know what you are doing, you can ignore some of them, but first > you need to verify what _exactly_ is failing, why, and can you live > with that. >
bash-4.1$ grep Error glibc-check-log make[2]: [/mnt/hd/buhera/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) make[2]: *** [/mnt/hd/buhera/glibc-build/rt/tst-cputimer1.out] Error 1 make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2 make: *** [check] Error 2 the end of glibc-check-log: termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/time.h time/sys/timeb.h wcsmbs/wchar.h wctype/wctype.h > /mnt/hd/buhera/glibc-build/begin-end-check.out make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hd/buhera/glibc-2.11.1' make: *** [check] Error 2 The script that's failing is the begin-end-check.pl Maybe I can skip that test to see if the remaining test are runinng... Regards, bendeguz -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
