On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:33:24PM +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > >On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:46:05 +0100 > >bendeguz <mailinglist...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The compiling runs fine, but the test fails. > > I've tried with an unpatched glibc source as well. > > I haven't updated any LFS packeges from my first build, > > just BLFS packages and the kernel (and bzip). > > Could that be a problem that I haven't updated the linux > > API headers? > > > > bendeguz > > Do NOT, under any circumstances, update the linux API headers on a > finished system. The cpp will become confused and the toolchain will > brake. My first LFS went down the drain when I made that mistake. > > As for the glibc test mistakes.. Well, what are they? > If you know what you are doing, you can ignore some of them, but first > you need to verify what _exactly_ is failing, why, and can you live > with that. > > >the end of glibc-check-log:
> >termios/sys/ttychars.h time/time.h time/sys/time.h time/sys/timeb.h > >wcsmbs/wchar.h wctype/wctype.h > > >/mnt/hd/buhera/glibc-build/begin-end-check.out > >make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. > >make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hd/buhera/glibc-2.11.1' > >make: *** [check] Error 2 > >The script that's failing is the begin-end-check.pl > >Maybe I can skip that test to see if the remaining test are runinng... I checked the begin-end-check.out, but there are no problems, there's 'OK' in every line. Maybe this is a correct output of make check for glibc? I can't remember the results the first time I built glibc. regards -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
