>From a newbie's perspective, of course, I think the problem with the "work backward" approach is it's easy to miss things that the newbie doesn't know (s)he also needs, e.g. log handling, firewall. I think, in most cases, the newbie first needs a "general purpose" end-user system that's manageable. Most of the popular distros hide just what that is composed of. It's not surprizing that they get to BLFS without a clear idea of what to pick and choose. I came to LFS from a "publisher's version" of RHL-6.1 "Cartman" back in 2003/4, when what one got was simpler and more exposed. (I found a loose LFS-4.1 CD at a Goodwill charity "Outlet" store, i.e. the last stop before the landfill, and my own LFS has pretty much been my "daily-driver" since. But it was good to have that early experience.) -- Paul Rogers paulgrog...@fastmail.fm http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/ Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-)
-- http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software or over the web -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page