On 02/23/2015 06:26 PM, Paul Rogers wrote: > >> You need to export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib before make install. >> Libraries in /usr/local/lib won't be picked up until you run >> "ldconfig" which isn't run by the make install process as it seems. > > I haven't been doing that. My "How Linux Works, 2nd Edition" book > recommends against it. Running ldconfig before make install is useless, > after is too late. > > I can leave it in /usr this time, but I don't consider GTK, or even X, > part of a "base" Linux system. I don't run runlevel 5 & xdm. Aren't we > supposed to "expect" the upstream Makefile to handle this sort of > problem? Should it be reported upstream? >
It's more of a libtool problem than GTK+ one. GTK+2 is in maintenance mode, so I doubt it will be fixed and they'll most likely advise you to do the same I told you to. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
