This comes from a PM with Pierre. >> > I'm not entirely comfortable to present running the test suite as >> > "optional". I'd be happier if it was presented as one of the >> > "strongly recommended", such as running the tests on glibc. The >> > potential for a catastrophic flaw is just a little too great. >> >> Well maybe. I suggest you discuss that on the list. I can't decide >> alone anyway. > > OK, I will.
So, can we have some discussion about this and come to a consensus? I wouldn't even consider NOT running the test quite on OpenJDK to validate my build. It's not "Optional" in my view, and I'd never suggest it is. -- Paul Rogers [email protected] Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) -- http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
