On 03-05-2015 20:27, Paul Rogers wrote:
> This comes from a PM with Pierre.
>>>> I'm not entirely comfortable to present running the test suite as
>>>> "optional".  I'd be happier if it was presented as one of the
>>>> "strongly recommended", such as running the tests on glibc.  The
>>>> potential for a catastrophic flaw is just a little too great.

What would be a catastrophic flaw? How the tests could prevent it?

I see in the site:

jdk8u60-b12     Passed  Failed*  Not Run**  Error   Summary Diff
jdk             4787    18       822        1       5628    7
hotspot         627     34       13         4       678     2
langtools       3078    0        0          0       3078    0

jdk8u60-b11     Passed  Failed*  Not Run**  Error   Summary Diff
jdk             4787    17       819        0       5623    1
hotspot         625     35       13         5       678     2
langtools       3078    0        0          0       3078    0

There is a relatively small number of failures, but the numbers are not
so small.

>>> Well maybe. I suggest you discuss that on the list. I can't decide
>>> alone anyway.
>>
>> OK, I will.
> 
> So, can we have some discussion about this and come to a consensus?  I
> wouldn't even consider NOT running the test quite on OpenJDK to validate
> my build.  It's not "Optional" in my view, and I'd never suggest it is.

I agree with Pierre, the instructions in the book have been much improved.

The comments "the test infrastructure of OpenJDK is a work in progress"
and "testing ... involves several steps" seem appropriate for an
optional part of the instructions.





To Pierre:

Following remarks are consequences of reading to reply to this post. The
page, as I said, has been much improved, since you started taking care
of it. Congratulations.

Following sentences have typo(s?) and perhaps could also be improved (it
may have been partially or totally written by me, so you could blame me):

{{{
There are a few failures, the number of which depends on various
conditions, like whether the computer is connected to network. Also,
some test may timeout if the machine is under load.
}}}

I don't know if "There are a few failures" is correct, "are" plural, "a"
singular.

s/some test/&s/ (learned with you)

Spell check does not recognize "timeout", but "time-out" or "time out".
Sometimes, I don't agree with it, but you decide.

-- 
[]s,
Fernando
-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to