Often it is the brand of phone too.  But the higher you go in frequency numbers 
the clearer it is supposed to be.  The old standard used to be 900 MHz.  I 
haven't looked in a while but last time I bought a phone I remember seeing a 
5.4 GHz or something like that.   I didn't spend the money on it so I can't say 
how well it works.  We have an AM radio tower in the lot joining our back yard. 
 You can talk to someone on the phone and listen to a football game at the same 
time...
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: robert moore 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 9:55 PM
  Subject: RE: [BlindHandyMan] advice on cordless phones


  One thing you could try is to put the base in the part of the house that is
  closest to your shop. At least as much as is practicle. The less obstruction
  you have the better. As for the type of phone I don't know.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Behalf Of GLENN PERMAR
  Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:20 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: [BlindHandyMan] advice on cordless phones

  We have a cordless phone that works fine in the house but if I take it out
  to the storage room or work shop or a short distance from the house it has
  terrible reception and a lot of static. If anyone has any ideas on which
  phones have the best reception for the longest distances I would appreciate
  hearing from you. Thanks Glenn,

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Edward Przybylek
  To: BlindHandyMan
  Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 12:00 PM
  Subject: [BlindHandyMan] Follow-up To Quartz VS Propane Heater

  Hi all,

  Thanks for all your responses to my query about quartz vs propane heaters.
  I decided to go with a propane heater and I picked one up at a reasonable
  price on eBay. It's a 20K unit and I've got it connected to a 20 pound
  tank. It's out in my two-car garage and it does a great job of keeping the
  entire garage quite warm. Again, thanks for everyone's advice. It helped a
  great deal in the final decision.

  Take care,
  Ed Przybylek

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to