Thank you, Philip!

>Finally, if there's a problem with 
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-fonts/font-synthesis-06-ref.html,
 
can you file a bug or a PR to fix the ref?

No, there is no problem with 
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-fonts/font-synthesis-06-ref.html,
 it's 
just not working correctly on Safari, I guess Safari has some bug.
On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 1:04:23 PM UTC+3 Philip Jägenstedt wrote:

> Thanks for confirming, Munira!
>
> Sounds like this is pretty well tested, and Chrome will pass almost all of 
> the tests.
>
> Regarding small-caps, the tables on MDN can definitely be wrong, I've sent 
> https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/12782 to fix the Safari 
> support here.
>
> Finally, if there's a problem with 
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-fonts/font-synthesis-06-ref.html,
>  
> can you file a bug or a PR to fix the ref?
>
> You already have 3xLGTM, but LGTM4.
>
> Best regards,
> Philip
>
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:34 PM Munira Tursunova <moo...@google.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> > Looking at the font-synthesis-* tests in 
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts?label=experimental&label=master&aligned,
>>  
>> many pass in Firefox and Safari, but not all of them. Do all of these tests 
>> pass with the implementation now in Blink?
>>
>> Yes, they do. Actually these tests had been added with the Chrome 
>> implementation and they are responsible for longhands for font-synthesis 
>> property which is not supported by other browsers yet.
>>
>> > In the chromestatus entry I see "There are additional tests for system 
>> fonts with platform specific results, so we keep those as internal tests." 
>> Is the problem there that the tests rely on system fonts, or that there are 
>> platform-specific results? The latter is possible with WPT using the 
>> regular third_party/blink/web_tests/platform/ expectations. For system 
>> fonts, perhaps these tests could be written to pass if the fonts aren't 
>> present? If these are testharness.js tests, 
>> https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/testharness-api.html#optional-features
>>  
>> might be a path forward.
>>
>> Yes, they rely on particular aspects of which fonts are available on the 
>> system. As the font-synthesis property, when applied to system fonts, is 
>> closely connected to font matching and identifying whether a true bold / 
>> true italic variant exists, it’d be hard to make those flexible in terms of 
>> a default passing when the font does not exist. They are ref tests for that 
>> purpose.
>>
>> >Also, looking at 
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font-synthesis#browser_compatibility
>>  
>> I wonder if small-caps is going to be supported? If that table is correct 
>> it's not supported by Safari and it's only just now coming to Firefox.
>>
>> Yes, small-caps support was also implemented in Blink (as longhand and as 
>> part of the shorthand). Also I’m not sure if that table is correct because 
>> Safari also supports ‘small-caps’ (only as a keyword in the shorthand) . 
>> They just have a bug in ref for this test: 
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts/font-synthesis-06.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>
>> On Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 11:28:57 AM UTC+3 Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>
>>> It's great to see this feature getting ready to ship, it's one of a 
>>> relatively small number of features already supported by Firefox and Safari 
>>> but not by Chromium browsers, so it's been on my radar :)
>>>
>>> I just have a few questions.
>>>
>>> Looking at the font-synthesis-* tests in 
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-fonts?label=experimental&label=master&aligned,
>>>  
>>> many pass in Firefox and Safari, but not all of them. Do all of these tests 
>>> pass with the implementation now in Blink?
>>>
>>> In the chromestatus entry I see "There are additional tests for system 
>>> fonts with platform specific results, so we keep those as internal tests." 
>>> Is the problem there that the tests rely on system fonts, or that there are 
>>> platform-specific results? The latter is possible with WPT using the 
>>> regular third_party/blink/web_tests/platform/ expectations. For system 
>>> fonts, perhaps these tests could be written to pass if the fonts aren't 
>>> present? If these are testharness.js tests, 
>>> https://web-platform-tests.org/writing-tests/testharness-api.html#optional-features
>>>  
>>> might be a path forward.
>>>
>>> Also, looking at 
>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font-synthesis#browser_compatibility
>>>  
>>> I wonder if small-caps is going to be supported? If that table is correct 
>>> it's not supported by Safari and it's only just now coming to Firefox.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:59 AM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> LGTM2
>>>>
>>>> /Daniel
>>>> On 2021-10-07 09:08, Yoav Weiss wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *LGTM1*
>>>> Thanks for working on this!! This seems like an important thing to 
>>>> catch up on! 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 6:56 PM 'Munira Tursunova' via blink-dev <
>>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails 
>>>>>
>>>>> moo...@google.com, dr...@chromium.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Explainer 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-synthesis-intro
>>>>>
>>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font-synthesis
>>>>>
>>>>> Specification 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/#font-synthesis
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary 
>>>>>
>>>>> The font-synthesis CSS property controls whether user agents are 
>>>>> allowed to synthesize oblique, bold and small-caps font faces when a font 
>>>>> family lacks oblique, bold and small-caps faces, respectively.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink component 
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink>Fonts 
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EFonts>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review status 
>>>>>
>>>>> Already shipped in other browsers, see below, no TAG review required.
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks 
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility Low, feature already shipped in 
>>>>> Firefox and Safari. 
>>>>>
>>>>> Expected graceful degradation if an engine has so far not implemented 
>>>>> this feature: if the font-synthesis: property is not understood by an 
>>>>> engine, this means unintended synthesis can occur. That's expected and 
>>>>> the 
>>>>> reason why this property was designed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signals
>>>>>
>>>>> Gecko: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font-synthesis#browser_compatibility)
>>>>>  
>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1706080
>>>>>
>>>>> WebKit: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144180)
>>>>>
>>>>> Web developers: No signals
>>>>>
>>>>> Activation 
>>>>>
>>>>> None expected, feature already implemented in other browsers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>>
>>>>> Same as any other CSS property, css_properties.json will be rolled to 
>>>>> DevTools during development.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ? 
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, 36 new web tests pass: 16 new internal platform specific tests 
>>>>> were added, 12 new WPT tests were added and 8 existing WPT tests are now 
>>>>> passing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? 
>>>>>
>>>>> False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=509989
>>>>>
>>>>> Sample links 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#font-synthesis-intro
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>>
>>>>> No milestones specified
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5640605355999232
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> <https://www.chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_AmPR6X7evqGz9P7bkW2ysRmr%3DqP4ajgGA%2BjOGfsp_FrA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAO7W_AmPR6X7evqGz9P7bkW2ysRmr%3DqP4ajgGA%2BjOGfsp_FrA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXyqaq60U%2BEzTWxYLhhZcW%3DyjZMetHjkgfmjpWibOWLxg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXyqaq60U%2BEzTWxYLhhZcW%3DyjZMetHjkgfmjpWibOWLxg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/948ab999-2298-be47-ecab-d9585ea31b22%40gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/948ab999-2298-be47-ecab-d9585ea31b22%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/af8481f2-70c0-4314-9d4c-10ecde31730dn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to