LGTM3.

-mike

On Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 10:37:59 PM UTC+1 Rick Byers wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Domenic Denicola <dome...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 11:24 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> *Contact emails*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * miketa...@chromium.org <miketa...@chromium.org>, abe...@chromium.org 
>>> <abe...@chromium.org>, jadekess...@chromium.org <jadekess...@chromium.org> 
>>> Explainer 
>>> https://github.com/WICG/ua-client-hints#explainer-reducing-user-agent-granularity
>>>  
>>> <https://github.com/WICG/ua-client-hints#explainer-reducing-user-agent-granularity>
>>>  
>>> Specification https://www.chromium.org/updates/ua-reduction 
>>> <https://www.chromium.org/updates/ua-reduction> is the closest thing that 
>>> specifies Chrome’s UA Reduction plans today. As these changes land in 
>>> Chromium, the Compat Standard <https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/> will be 
>>> updated to reflect them (in the newly landed UA String section 
>>> <https://compat.spec.whatwg.org/#ua-string-section>).*
>>>
>>
>> I want to call out that this is some really great work. For years specs 
>> have basically said "use an implementation-defined value", but we knew that 
>> was not sufficient for web compatibility, and it was not useful to web 
>> developers or implementers. Years ago we started to capture some 
>> interesting constraints in HTML's definition of navigator compatibility 
>> mode <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-navigator-compatibility-mode>, 
>> but we knew there were many more.
>>
>> The work Mike has done has started to address this long-standing issue of 
>> spec tech debt, and it's really great that he's put in the extra work here 
>> instead of just taking advantage of the spec's historical looseness.
>>
>> I did a quick review on the spec and found some minor issues and clarity 
>> improvement suggestions 
>> <https://github.com/whatwg/compat/issues/created_by/domenic>, but 
>> overall this is a great foundation and gives me confidence others can both 
>> follow along with our plans, and implement compatible software based on 
>> them.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * Summary As previously detailed on the Chromium Blog 
>>> <https://blog.chromium.org/2021/09/user-agent-reduction-origin-trial-and-dates.html>,
>>>  
>>> we intend to proceed with Phase 4 of the User-Agent Reduction plan. In 
>>> Phase 4, the MINOR.BUILD.PATCH version numbers are reduced to "0.0.0". For 
>>> use cases requiring high-entropy full version information, developers are 
>>> encouraged to migrate to the User Agent Client Hints API 
>>> <https://web.dev/migrate-to-ua-ch/>, in particular the 
>>> Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List 
>>> <https://wicg.github.io/ua-client-hints/#sec-ch-ua-full-version-list> hint. 
>>> Blink component Blink 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink> TAG 
>>> review https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/640 
>>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/640> TAG review status 
>>> Issues addressed Risks Interoperability and Compatibility Any time you 
>>> modify the User-Agent string there is a risk of some content somewhere 
>>> depending on the previous format. There should not be interop risks, as 
>>> each browser sends its own User-Agent string. But there is a risk that 
>>> content somewhere is relying on “non-zero” MINOR, BUILD, or PATCH 
>>> information. My personal view is that the risk is low compared to the rest 
>>> of the changes to come in later phases. But in order to mitigate the risk 
>>> of this change, we intend to slowly roll it out via Finch and observe 
>>> health metrics (i.e., HTTP 4XX and 5XX error codes, etc.) and bug reports 
>>> from the community. We've surveyed dozens of User-Agent parsing libraries, 
>>> and as far as we know "0.0.0" will not create a problem syntactically. But 
>>> the web can get pretty weird in ways we don't anticipate, hence the slow 
>>> roll-out and incremental path towards User-Agent Reduction. Gecko: 
>>> Shipped/Shipping. Firefox has frozen (or capped) much of their UA string 
>>> already. WebKit: Shipped/Shipping. Safari has already frozen everything in 
>>> their UA string except for version number info. Web developers: Mixed 
>>> signals. Reactions have ranged from positive to indifferent to negative, 
>>> from various channels. Debuggability No special DevTools support needed. Is 
>>> this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?
>>>  
>>> No Flag name reduce-user-agent Requires code in //chrome? False Tracking 
>>> bug https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1282229 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1282229> Launch bug 
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1282238 
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1282238> Estimated 
>>> milestones We aim to start rollout in M101. We will update this thread once 
>>> the feature is shipping to 100% of the stable population. Link to entry on 
>>> the Chrome Platform Status 
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6311349754789888 
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/feature/6311349754789888> *
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/05b6cf46-7bce-bd03-8a93-0db496a3a26e%40chromium.org
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/05b6cf46-7bce-bd03-8a93-0db496a3a26e%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra_K7OF8TLhuWZXq8ROjb%2Bns2hDbPow%2BhFOFKMhc9pvUHQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra_K7OF8TLhuWZXq8ROjb%2Bns2hDbPow%2BhFOFKMhc9pvUHQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/5fdd1407-5cd6-48cc-b479-a4261c448ca7n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to