(remove in M108, to be clear - just restating from the Chromestatus entry
as Yoav asked about the timeline)

On Wed, Sept 21, 2022, 9:00 a.m. Rouslan Solomakhin <rous...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> Due to the low uptake (< 0.00010 % page loads), we were planning to remove
> PaymentInstruments API without deprecation reporting, but I am happy to
> adjust our plans if necessary. What would you recommend?
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 1:42 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> What did you have in mind in terms of a deprecation timeline? Are you
>> planning to pipe that through CountDeprecation
>> <https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/renderer/core/frame/deprecation/deprecation.h;l=41?q=deprecation.h&ss=chromium>
>>  to
>> ensure deprecation reporting?
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:26 PM Rouslan Solomakhin <rous...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > Would we expect those uses to break? Are they feature detecting the
>>> API before using it?
>>>
>>> Partially (for both questions!). In examining the site logic we have
>>> found that:
>>>
>>> Good news:
>>>
>>>    1. These websites will correctly fall back to JIT install of payment
>>>    handlers in the absence of PaymentInstruments. That does not use the
>>>    PaymentInstruments API and will continue to work as before.
>>>    2. The websites are feature-detecting the parent PaymentManager
>>>    interface, registration.paymentManager, which is currently
>>>    implemented only in Blink.
>>>
>>> Bad news:
>>>
>>>    1. Once the websites detect the presence of
>>>    registration.paymentManager, they assume that it has all of the
>>>    fields present, including registration.paymentManager.instruments.
>>>    If we remove this instruments field, then there will be some
>>>    JavaScript errors on these websites. As far as we can tell, these errors
>>>    are limited in impact and do not affect overall site functionality.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 5:20 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 9:03 PM Rouslan Solomakhin <
>>>> rous...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>> >  do we have any reason to believe there are consumers of this API
>>>>> who have disabled telemetry, i.e. maybe in enterprise contexts?
>>>>>
>>>>> We don't have any indications that this could be happening.
>>>>>
>>>>> > do we know how these few sites who are using the API... are using
>>>>> the API? Does any real-world usage show up in HTTP Archive?
>>>>>
>>>>> Found 2 websites in HTTP Archive:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. A payment app website that also uses a JIT install for payment
>>>>>    handlers.
>>>>>    2. A payment app website that installs a payment handler when you
>>>>>    visit their home page, but the code looks more like a demo because of
>>>>>    hard-coded strings.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would we expect those uses to break? Are they feature detecting the
>>>> API before using it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Happy to discuss further.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Rouslan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:23 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rouslan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Usage is indeed low - do we have any reason to believe there are
>>>>>> consumers of this API who have disabled telemetry, i.e. maybe in 
>>>>>> enterprise
>>>>>> contexts? And do we know how these few sites who are using the API... are
>>>>>> using the API? Does any real-world usage show up in HTTP Archive?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/14/22 8:55 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LGTM1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 8:05 AM Rouslan Solomakhin <
>>>>>> rous...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Contact emails rous...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments
>>>>>>> <https://w3c.github.io/payment-handler/#paymentinstruments-interface>
>>>>>>> is the Web API that backs non-JIT install of payment apps (see
>>>>>>> https://w3c.github.io/payment-handler/). It was designed with the
>>>>>>> assumption that the browser would store the actual payment instrument
>>>>>>> details, which has not turned out to be true, and has some privacy 
>>>>>>> leaks.
>>>>>>> It also has not shipped on any other browser, not have we seen any 
>>>>>>> interest
>>>>>>> from other browser vendors. As such, we are interested in deprecating 
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> removing the API.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blink component Blink>Payments
>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPayments>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Motivation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The PaymentInstruments.set() method allows an attacker website to
>>>>>>> store arbitrary data, which can later be retrieved via
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.get() potentially in a third-party context. For 
>>>>>>> example,
>>>>>>> the user visits https://tracker.example, which generates and stores
>>>>>>> a UUID for that user via PaymentInstruments.set(key, UUID). Later, the 
>>>>>>> user
>>>>>>> visits https://site.example, which opens an iframe for
>>>>>>> https://tracker.example. That iframe calls
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.get(key) and can retrieve the UUID, thus allowing
>>>>>>> https://tracker.example to know which user it is. Given the lack of
>>>>>>> uptake in PaymentInstruments.set(), versus the more common JIT-install
>>>>>>> path, as well as the overly powerful nature of the API, we propose to
>>>>>>> remove PaymentInstruments entirely. (PaymentInstruments was designed 
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> the belief that the browser would know about individual payment methods
>>>>>>> (e.g., credit cards) rather than payment apps, hence the need to
>>>>>>> store/retrieve arbitrary information.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility *Gecko*: Does not implement the 
>>>>>>> Payment
>>>>>>> Handler API.
>>>>>>> *WebKit*: Does not implement the Payment Handler API.
>>>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Other signals*:  Metrics of API usage show little to no uptake (<
>>>>>>> 0.00010 % page loads)
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4229
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.clear -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4230
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.delete -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4231
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.get -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4232
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.has -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4233
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.keys -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4234
>>>>>>> PaymentInstruments.set -
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4235
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WebView application risks Payment Handler API is not implemented in
>>>>>>> WebView.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Standard DevTools debugging.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>> Yes -
>>>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/payment-handler/payment-instruments.https.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tracking bug https://crbug.com/1327265
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Launch bug https://crbug.com/1363633
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would like to remove in M108.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5099285054488576
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMMzaWGzus%3DU48U06m-gk7_2G6Wnhn59UJXLi9xW9uz5%2BEWQuA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMMzaWGzus%3DU48U06m-gk7_2G6Wnhn59UJXLi9xW9uz5%2BEWQuA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw8_gN61x4ijCz_Dz433Lf8B-Vbi0rrtKjUFnXJ1Lw__SQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw8_gN61x4ijCz_Dz433Lf8B-Vbi0rrtKjUFnXJ1Lw__SQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMMzaWH6hkEcc3yx0%3DhP%2Bup7gHw1KeS5KW_hi0YbU9t7oi1yVA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAMMzaWH6hkEcc3yx0%3DhP%2Bup7gHw1KeS5KW_hi0YbU9t7oi1yVA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADY3Mad1RZ%2BH2V3ZoZ5KWyXaAvRN_Mmfg1%2Bz63xRBpWrEiYnYQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to