hi Brian

Please feel free to add me to the CC list.

Vivian



On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 4:30:26 PM UTC-8 Jonathan Lee wrote:

> (Adding my team to CC, who might be interested.)
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> Feel free to send some my way.
>
> Jonathan
> On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 2:18:05 PM UTC-8 Brian Sheedy wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> TL;DR: I'm looking for a handful of people who are familiar with web 
>> tests/web test expectations that would be willing to occasionally be CCed 
>> on generated CLs. You shouldn't need to do anything, but we need a human 
>> CCed on generated CLs that are being autosubmitted.
>>
>> I'm in the process of automating the Blink unexpected pass finder/stale 
>> expectation remover 
>> <https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/tools/blinkpy/web_tests/stale_expectation_removal/remove_stale_expectations.py>
>>  to 
>> help increase the amount of usable test coverage we have at any given time. 
>> The bot appears to be fully functional and can generate CLs like this 
>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4011163>. All 
>> that's really left is to enable autosubmit, but there doesn't appear to be 
>> a good list of people that we could CC on the CLs.
>>
>> The recipe we're using on the bot supports grabbing someone from a 
>> rotation, but AFAIK there isn't a suitable Blink rotation we could use. The 
>> other option is to have a list of people to randomly select from, which is 
>> what we'll be doing, but there doesn't seem to be a good source for a list 
>> of suitable people - the OWNERS file for the relevant directory 
>> <https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/web_tests/OWNERS>
>>  
>> just lists *.
>>
>> So, I'm looking for volunteers to occasionally be CCed on these generated 
>> CLs. The expected frequency is <1 CL per day - the bot will run daily, but 
>> will only CC one person from the list each time. You should not need to do 
>> anything, as the CLs will be set to autosubmit and will be approved by the 
>> rubber stamper bot. If the CL ends up getting falsely rejected by the CQ, 
>> it would be nice if the CCed person could trigger another run, but that is 
>> not critical. If a CL fails to submit, a new one with similar changes will 
>> just be generated the next day.
>>
>> Any volunteers?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/e6d95622-fa27-448e-a80f-9a31ea87c78en%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to