Since it's already been a while since this intent was approved, can you
send an "Intent to extend experimentation" so it'd get caught in our
tooling?

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:38 AM Daisuke Enomoto <denom...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> Hi, API owners,
>
> We had requested this Origin Trial to be run for 3 milestones,
> specifically from 107 to 109. This was previously approved. We sent the
> original request without realizing the Origin Trial guideline
> <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#step-5-optional-origin-trial>
> suggesting 6 milestones.
>
> We would like to extend this OT for another 3 milestones or to 112
> inclusive by applying the 6 milestone guidelines we originally missed, to
> give sufficient time for partners to give us feedback. It would be great if
> you could review our request.
>
> Thanks!
> Daisuke
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:01 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> LGTM to experiment 107-109 inclusive.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:17 AM Fergal Daly <fer...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emailsfer...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>> https://github.com/fergald/docs/blob/master/explainers/permissions-policy-unload.md
>>>
>>> Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/7915
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> This feature allows pages to disable the running of unload event
>>> handlers. The goal is to : - allow sites that have removed all unload
>>> handlers to ensure they do not accidentally add new ones - allow sites to
>>> remove unload handlers when updating the code is infeasible Unload event
>>> handlers are problematic for various reasons and prevent use of BFCache on
>>> Desktop (see https://web.dev/bfcache/#never-use-the-unload-event).
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink componentBlink>PermissionsAPI
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPermissionsAPI>
>>>
>>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/738
>>>
>>> TAG review statusPending
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> 3rd-party frames that rely on unload may not work as expected when
>>> navigating away. This is solvable by the frame authors by use of
>>> alternatives to unload and is unlikely to impact users. See detailed
>>> discussion.
>>> https://github.com/fergald/docs/blob/master/explainers/permissions-policy-unload.md#concerns-about-giving-embedders-control-over-the-nonexecution-of-iframe-code
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Negative (
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/444#issuecomment-1047829132)
>>> FF objects to this similar to sync-xhr and document-domain providing a way
>>> to cause cross-origin interference with script. Explainer addresses this (
>>> https://github.com/fergald/docs/blob/master/explainers/permissions-policy-unload.md#concerns-about-giving-embedders-control-over-the-nonexecution-of-iframe-code)
>>> At a recent TPAC meeting with Mozilla people present, no negative feedback
>>> was received. Request for formal position is here
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/691
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive Private discussions with devs are positive.
>>> Sites that have made efforts to remove all unload handlers want to use this
>>> to prevent accidental returns. Also some providers of 3rd-party iframes
>>> which have content outside of their control (e.g. ad network) want to
>>> guarantee themselves to be unload-free.
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/444#issuecomment-1130401722
>>>  Also
>>> positive feedback about using this to deny unload as a source of security
>>> problems.
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/444#issuecomment-1222973324
>>>
>>> *Other signals*: TAG review is here but has no feedback on the API
>>> itself. https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/738
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> none known
>>>
>>>
>>> Goals for experimentation
>>>
>>> - Validate that this allows sites using it to improve their BFCache hit
>>> rate
>>>
>>>
>>> Reason this experiment is being extended
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ongoing technical constraints
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> When this header is present, attempts to add an unload event handler
>>> will result in an error on the console (just as would happen for any other
>>> Permissions Policy violation).
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?Yes
>>>
>>> Flag nameenable-experimental-web-platform-features
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>
>>> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1324111
>>>
>>> Launch bughttps://crbug.com/1357927
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> OriginTrial desktop last 109
>>> OriginTrial desktop first 107
>>> DevTrial on desktop 107
>>> OriginTrial Android last 109
>>> OriginTrial Android first 107
>>> DevTrial on Android 107
>>> OriginTrial webView last 109
>>> OriginTrial webView first 107
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5760325231050752
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAozHLkvhEtVOkvW4iXCbMf5a84ypGjD4arZtpS%3D0Okx6BPDdQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAozHLkvhEtVOkvW4iXCbMf5a84ypGjD4arZtpS=0okx6bp...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Ready for Trial:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/38Dpu-uhwFc
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAozHLkOeqfqZ0PtzUDdowXbBuMp4oYS%3DQ%2BSQCogY%2BkBpGAYXQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAAozHLkOeqfqZ0PtzUDdowXbBuMp4oYS%3DQ%2BSQCogY%2BkBpGAYXQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfWov9LkezrWa6wV%2BGH9bKAC1_dPYRH7yyUTvjmSS%3Dv84w%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfWov9LkezrWa6wV%2BGH9bKAC1_dPYRH7yyUTvjmSS%3Dv84w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfXyD77SZ2v69_VoEw2_Jmi9cUyJ4Y9oaim1rNX7ctPBaQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to