The Quest browser implemented this feature a couple of years ago and it's
used by many WebXR experiences to control the frame rate.
Often sites lower the frame rate because it's more important to have a
smooth rate than a rate that is faster but with stuttering.

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:13 AM Alex Cooper <alcoo...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Contact emailsalcoo...@chromium.org, bial...@chromium.org
>
> ExplainerNone
>
> Specification
> https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/#apply-the-nominal-frame-rate
>
> Summary
>
> Allows querying for the current target frame rate of the XR Session,
> querying for the frame rates that the session supports, and requesting a
> change to the target frame rate.
>
>
> Blink componentBlink>WebXR
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EWebXR>
>
> Motivation
>
>
>
> Initial public proposal
>
> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/545
> https://github.com/w3c/transitions/issues/420
>
> TAG review statusIssues addressed
>
> Risks
>
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
>
>
> *Gecko*: Positive (https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552)
> Re-using signals from overall WebXR API chromestatus entry (
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552), since this is a part
> of the CR for that API that we haven't implemented yet.
>
> *WebKit*: No signal (https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552)
> Re-using signals from overall WebXR API chromestatus entry (
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552), since this is a part
> of the CR for that API that we haven't implemented yet.
>
> *Web developers*: Strongly positive (
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552) Re-using signals from
> overall WebXR API chromestatus entry (
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5680169905815552), since this is a part
> of the CR for that API that we haven't implemented yet.
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> WebView application risks
>
> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>
>
>
> Debuggability
>
>
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?No
>
> Flag name
>
> Requires code in //chrome?False
>
> Tracking bughttps://crbug.com/1377432
>
> Estimated milestones
>
> No milestones specified
>
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5157293366181888
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGOLbz36QHGLYyz2H_6CnsuiwN_y002YRg%2BCeWzs_dvPxhLEWg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGOLbz36QHGLYyz2H_6CnsuiwN_y002YRg%2BCeWzs_dvPxhLEWg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGN7qDCMBf8DGhnNo7qtB8K95SyfERt4idVQDhzgus_RwD%2BTog%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to