Ahh, LGTM3.. :) On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 6:22 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
> LGTM1 > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 6:21 PM Joey Arhar <jar...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Yes I believe that we could change this behavioe after shipping. >> I feel confident that we will get consensus before launching though. >> >> On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:33 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Thanks!! Do I understand correctly, and we'd be able to adjust our >>> implementation to whatever's decided, even after we ship? Or would that >>> trigger breakage? >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 6:09 PM Joey Arhar <jar...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> > Thoughts on Emilio's question on >>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/762#issuecomment-1483059117 >>>> RE spec text and avoiding circularity? >>>> >>>> This is about deciding how to implement the behavior when display:none >>>> is specified in a keyframes rule in a way which makes it hard or impossible >>>> to extend not-none rules through the whole animation, which is either going >>>> to be converting it to display:revert or allowing display:none without >>>> canceling the animation. This is not the intended use case of this feature >>>> and I don't think it will happen often, so I don't think it should be >>>> blocking. >>>> >>>> Whether we do display:revert or not cancel the animation is still under >>>> discussion, and it sounds like we are leaning towards not canceling the >>>> animation because it will be simpler to spec. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 2:57 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thoughts on Emilio's question on >>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/762#issuecomment-1483059117 >>>>> RE spec text and avoiding circularity? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 6:10 AM tkent via Chromestatus < >>>>> admin+tk...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> LGTM2. It's a small addition to existing features, and would have >>>>>> very small risks. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/000000000000ca69eb05f79e681a%40google.com >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/000000000000ca69eb05f79e681a%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUc1erPCR1x9oncAGtMsKY_QkbifvhKAUDXDuE70D7WWw%40mail.gmail.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUc1erPCR1x9oncAGtMsKY_QkbifvhKAUDXDuE70D7WWw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfU1z7x5CnFjjdP5O3fDMhPpy75HA02Bu_4_Cqrq-Dj5GA%40mail.gmail.com.
