LGTM2

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:46 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 7:17 PM Alex Turner <ale...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Mike: thanks for the clarification, I've added a comment to the TAG
>> review and kicked off those reviews in a new entry:
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5148973702840320. I'll ping this thread
>> when those reviews are complete.
>>
>> Yoav: yes, that's our understanding (although until enrollment is
>> enforced there is a chance we don't have a complete view of the testers).
>> We're in touch with a few partners who are using it that we will
>> communicate to directly. We also have a mailing list to broadcast these
>> kinds of updates more generally. Given that, we feel confident the impact
>> will be minimal to those testing the API.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:50 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Am I right to assume that the API is still only being used by a
>>> relatively small number of partners to which y'all can communicate the new
>>> constraints?
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:08:43 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Alex,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for the delay. It would probably be good to make a new entry
>>>> and request all the relevant review approvals (sorry for the extra work).
>>>>
>>>> Also, probably useful to drop a link in the TAG review to this Intent,
>>>> so reviewers can eventually be aware of these changes.
>>>> On 9/27/23 2:35 PM, Alex Turner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I set this feature up as a "Web developer facing change to existing
>>>> code", but I'm seeing that "New feature incubation" may have been more
>>>> appropriate (although the guidance
>>>> <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#feature-types> is
>>>> a bit uncertain). Unfortunately, that means chromestatus won't let me
>>>> request any reviews other than API owners; would it make sense to create a
>>>> new feature entry? (Note also that these changes have already gone through
>>>> internal privacy and security reviews.)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:02 PM Chris Harrelson <chris...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please also fill out the other chromestatus review categories for this
>>>>> Intent, in particular for Privacy and Security, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:14 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alex Turner <ale...@chromium.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Contact emails ale...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Specification
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Null report fixes:
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/91
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Debug mode eligibility changes:
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/90
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Padding report payloads:
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/98,
>>>>>>>    https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/pull/1030
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Reducing delay:
>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>> https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/103
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We're planning a few bundled changes to Private Aggregation:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Null report fixes: Currently reports with no contributions are
>>>>>>>    inadvertently dropped. This change ensures that, when a context ID is
>>>>>>>    specified, a null report is sent even if budget is denied. 
>>>>>>> Separately, it
>>>>>>>    fixes a bug causing budget to always be denied for null reports.
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Debug mode eligibility changes: Currently, debug mode is always
>>>>>>>    available. This change only allows debug mode for callers that are 
>>>>>>> allowed
>>>>>>>    access to third-party cookies, silently dropping the debug mode 
>>>>>>> otherwise.
>>>>>>>    Note that this will allow debug mode to automatically sunset when
>>>>>>>    third-party cookies are deprecated.
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Padding report payloads: To avoid the payload size being
>>>>>>>    dependent on the number of contributions, we will pad it with 'null'
>>>>>>>    contributions to a fixed length. **Note**: this change will also 
>>>>>>> affect
>>>>>>>    Attribution Reporting’s aggregatable reports.
>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    Reducing delay: When a context ID is specified, we remove the
>>>>>>>    randomized 10-60 minute delay, which is superfluous as a report is 
>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>    sent in this case. Instead, we just wait until the Shared Storage 
>>>>>>> operation
>>>>>>>    timeout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blink component Blink>PrivateAggregation
>>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPrivateAggregation>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TAG review https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/846 (We
>>>>>>> have not requested a signal for these changes specifically.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TAG review status Pending
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - Null report fixes: Increases the number of reports sent to
>>>>>>>    reporting endpoints, reporting endpoints using plaintext debug 
>>>>>>> payloads
>>>>>>>    will need to handle the null report case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you know if current reporting endpoints are ready to handle this
>>>>>> change?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - Debug mode eligibility changes: Backwards incompatible for
>>>>>>>    callers using enableDebugMode() without third-party cookie 
>>>>>>> eligibility.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Were callers already ready to have the enableDebugMode() call fail?
>>>>>> Does it throw, or silently fails?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - Padding report payloads: Compatible with existing aggregation
>>>>>>>    service versions. Reporting endpoints will see larger payloads and 
>>>>>>> null
>>>>>>>    contributions added to the plaintext debug payloads (if used).
>>>>>>>    - Reducing delay: Should not require any reporting endpoint
>>>>>>>    changes, reports will simply arrive earlier.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Gecko*: No signal (
>>>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/805). We have
>>>>>>> not requested a signal for these changes specifically. The Gecko 
>>>>>>> position
>>>>>>> on Shared Storage (one of the ways Private Aggregation is exposed) is
>>>>>>> negative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>>>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/189). We have
>>>>>>> not requested a signal for these changes specifically
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive for reducing delay
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based 
>>>>>>> applications?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No new debug capabilities beyond the existing internals page (
>>>>>>> chrome://private-aggregation-internals) and temporary debug mode.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All but Webview
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>>> ? WPTs will be added when features are enabled.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flags None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Finch feature name Padding:
>>>>>>> PrivacySandboxAggregationServiceReportPadding
>>>>>>> All other features: PrivateAggregationApiBundledEnhancements
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? Only for settings checks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tracking bug https://crbug.com/1481761
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Launch bug https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4272421
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We intend to ship in M119.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>>> None
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5205079858085888
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Previous I2S
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/8cKaLstq2QQ/m/Udrbb4ifDQAJ>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAA%2BBiF%3DMBk5ra9sn9i4ajaNSd9aMFKE_9DpxE8pziGY6YXB9Mg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAA%2BBiF%3DMBk5ra9sn9i4ajaNSd9aMFKE_9DpxE8pziGY6YXB9Mg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUzy0MKk6iD4MhPyeUwA-MESOo%2BGwsVX-GSb_MQUw2N8A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUzy0MKk6iD4MhPyeUwA-MESOo%2BGwsVX-GSb_MQUw2N8A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAA%2BBiFnMoYuB98RHAHwm_f9VghuGZxc_VXMCMt1KXNbPoRvTkw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAA%2BBiFnMoYuB98RHAHwm_f9VghuGZxc_VXMCMt1KXNbPoRvTkw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVvRsH0F3Eya4g7ZU-gt-UcRauZ7YOjoWUHg1A_oTtDfQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVvRsH0F3Eya4g7ZU-gt-UcRauZ7YOjoWUHg1A_oTtDfQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw-3%2BFG%3DFmdARrf-D%2B3r907GricF0Y2dKBTM7DyLvkzjvg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to