On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 2:32 AM Philip Jägenstedt <foo...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> LGTM3 with sentimental feelings.
>
> Back in 2010 (https://dev.opera.com/blog/re-introducing-video/) I was
> cheering for Theora and shipped support in Presto. We now have other open
> and RF video codecs which have been deployed on a much larger scale, and
> I'd like to think that Theora and the Xiph folks helped make the case for
> why we needed those codecs. Thank you Theora!
>

+1, Theora definitely helped light the path to where we are today with
https://aomedia.org/. Thanks to all the early folks involved who got us
here.


>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:37 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM2
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:05 PM Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> WMF has long switched away from Theora (to VP9) per prior discussions
>>> with them and seconded by this comment:
>>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T329258#9275042
>>>
>>> Switching to H264+MP4 is not necessary to avoid this deprecation.
>>> VP9+MP4, VP9/VP8+WEBM, or even VP8+OGG are all more viable open codec
>>> options.
>>>
>>> - dale
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 8:41 PM Yuhong Bao <yuhong.bao....@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am asking the WMF to add MP4:
>>>> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T329258
>>>> On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 8:53:14 AM UTC-7 Dale Curtis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Contact emailsdalec...@chromium.org
>>>>>
>>>>> ExplainerNone
>>>>>
>>>>> Specificationhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> Chrome will deprecate and remove support for the Theora video codec in
>>>>> desktop Chrome due to emerging security risks. Theora's low (and now often
>>>>> incorrect) usage no longer justifies support for most users. Notes: - Zero
>>>>> day attacks against media codecs have spiked. - Usage has fallen below
>>>>> measurable levels in UKM. - The sites we manually inspected before levels
>>>>> dropped off were incorrectly preferring Theora over more modern codecs 
>>>>> like
>>>>> VP9. - It's never been supported by Safari or Chrome on Android. - An
>>>>> ogv.js polyfill exists for the sites that still need Theora support. - We
>>>>> are not removing support for ogg containers. Our plan is to begin
>>>>> escalating experiments turning down Theora support in M120. During this
>>>>> time users can reactivate Theora support via
>>>>> chrome://flags/#theora-video-codec if needed. The tentative timeline for
>>>>> this is (assuming everything goes smoothly): - ~Oct 23, 2023: begin 50/50
>>>>> canary dev experiments. - ~Nov 1-6, 2023: begin 50/50 beta experiments. -
>>>>> ~Dec 6, 2023: begin 1% stable experiments. - ~Jan 8, 2024: begin 50% 
>>>>> stable
>>>>> experiments. - ~Jan 16th, 2024: launch at 100%. - ~Feb 2024: remove code
>>>>> and chrome://flag in M123. - ~Mar 2024: Chrome 123 will roll to stable.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink componentInternals>Media>Codecs
>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3EMedia%3ECodecs>
>>>>>
>>>>> Search tagstheora <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:theora>, vp3
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:vp3>, video
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:video>
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG reviewNone
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>> Sites which only provide a Theora video source will no longer have
>>>>> video playback. These sites would already be broken in Chrome for Android
>>>>> or Safari.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Under consideration Private discussions. I asked if they'd
>>>>> like an RFP for this, but haven't yet heard back.
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: Shipped/Shipping (https://caniuse.com/ogv) Safari never
>>>>> shipped support for Theora.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: Mixed signals Most developers are not likely to
>>>>> have an opinion, some may lament the loss of one of the first open codecs
>>>>> on the web.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>
>>>>> Security
>>>>>
>>>>> Security positive change -- removes support for a complicated binary
>>>>> parsing and decoding mechanism.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>> None, never supported on Android or WebView.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability
>>>>>
>>>>> Can be debugged through media dev tools or chrome://media-internals.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> Not currently supported on Chrome for Android.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?Yes
>>>>>
>>>>> As part of pre-work, I've switched all tests using Theora (of which
>>>>> there were hundreds) over to using VP8/VP9 where appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag name on chrome://flagsTheoraVideoCodec
>>>>>
>>>>> Finch feature nameTheoraVideoCodec
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1489034
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>> DevTrial on desktop 120
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5158654475239424
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPUDrwcHS-cEzLXpJ6HTkQC-GU9eRhsjXg3wNBfLZX%3DTcF-Tiw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPUDrwcHS-cEzLXpJ6HTkQC-GU9eRhsjXg3wNBfLZX%3DTcF-Tiw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbvm%2BgrXCRsHY-R-AocRZ%3DjDJ%3DrB5-3bG9x%2BA8NaLxMw%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfVbvm%2BgrXCRsHY-R-AocRZ%3DjDJ%3DrB5-3bG9x%2BA8NaLxMw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPUDrweDVsCOAantYsmSUcJ2mXB_218WqShW8-Er%2BZxiN_bkNA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to