Hi Chris:

https://chromestatus.com/feature/6266812908175360 is the new entry for this
feature (because feature type is read-only).  The review bits should now be
visible to API Owners, please let know if that's not the case.

Mustaq

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 5:03 PM Chris Harrelson <chris...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> Hi Mustaq,
>
> "web developer facing change to existing code" is meant for "bugfix-level
> changes to web APIs", which is why it only requires a PSA (sorry for the
> confusion - this has been a common issue and the chromestatus team is
> working on improved UI to be less confusing).
>
> In your case you are making a change that adjusts web-exposed behavior
> enough that it requires an I2S. So you'll need to update the feature type
> and file for all 5 review bits before the API owners can re-review.
>
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:30 AM Mustaq Ahmed <mus...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike:
>>
>> Through our offline discussion I learned that for "web developer facing
>> change to existing code", the new intent process requires merely a "PSA"
>> without (perhaps) any need for additional approvals.  I changed the email
>> template subject here from "PSA" to "I2S" only to secure "API Owners"
>> approval, finding no obvious way to do it through the chromestatus UI!
>>
>> Anyway, the updated chromestatus entry now seems to say those additional
>> approvals are not needed.  Please let me know if I missed anything.
>>
>> Mustaq
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:39 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mustaq,
>>>
>>> Please take a moment to request the other review bits (API OWNERs will
>>> wait until those are in progress to begin our review). See
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bqvB1oap0Yc/m/YlO8DEHgAQAJ
>>> for more info.
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>> Mike
>>> On 10/19/23 3:41 PM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote:
>>>
>>> Contact emails mus...@chromium.org, fla...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Specification
>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/uievents/#events-mouseevent-event-order
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> After an event target gets removed from the DOM, the logical target of
>>> the pointer as implied by the Pointer and Mouse boundary events (i.e. over,
>>> out, enter and leave events) should be the nearest ancestor still attached
>>> to the DOM. PEWG has recently reached consensus on this behavior, see
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/380. Chrome has
>>> been keeping track of a node even after it gets removed from DOM. As a
>>> result, if the pointer moves to a new node B after the hit-test node A is
>>> removed from DOM, the boundary event sequence (pointerover, pointerout,
>>> pointerenter, pointerleave events and the corresponding mouse events) used
>>> to imply a pointer movement from A to B. As per the new consensus, the
>>> event sequence should imply a pointer movement from the "parent of A" to B.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component Blink>Input
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EInput>
>>>
>>> TAG review None
>>>
>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> There is no interop risk because major browsers are currently all
>>> slightly different from one another. We are strictly improving the
>>> situation through the intent here by having Chrome match an agreed-upon
>>> behavior that's already tested (
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/380). The compat
>>> risk is negligible for the same reason, existing sites could not rely on
>>> the current behavior in all browsers. This is also changing a very narrow
>>> use-case.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/380) Mozilla
>>> originally called out the interop problem here.
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive (https://crbug.com/1147998)
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ? Yes
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/pointerevents?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&q=pointerevent_after_target_appended.html%20or%20pointerevent_after_target_removed.html%20or%20pointerup_after_pointerdown_target_removed.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on chrome://flags None
>>>
>>> Finch feature name BoundaryEventDispatchTracksNodeRemoval
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug https://crbug.com/1147998
>>>
>>> Sample links
>>> https://output.jsbin.com/yumacid
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> Shipping on desktop 121
>>> Shipping on Android 121
>>> Shipping on WebView 121
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> None
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5182447084109824
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO5zUdYJkRxo5kdVWpFJ%3DB50okhHr0EuWuc-WX9g7BPW0A%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO5zUdYJkRxo5kdVWpFJ%3DB50okhHr0EuWuc-WX9g7BPW0A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO67thtshr2w-dD%3Dy%2B-KoT_r0iKihadFhh-nxZkJDbBWGQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO67thtshr2w-dD%3Dy%2B-KoT_r0iKihadFhh-nxZkJDbBWGQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAB0cuO6UpuKK%2BJmmdzuh1bu2gU4Cja75Ww4OVXJyuEv306KUmQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to