LGTM3

On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:08:21 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote:

> LGTM2
> On 11/24/23 8:53 AM, Rick Byers wrote:
>
> Thanks, good enough for me! LGTM1
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:32 AM François Beaufort <fbeauf...@google.com> 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 1:46 AM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Seems trivial to me, just one little question:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 10:34 AM 'François Beaufort' via blink-dev <
>>> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Contact emails 
>>>>
>>>> fbeauf...@google.com, cwal...@google.com
>>>>
>>>> Explainer 
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/4342
>>>>
>>>> Specification 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#abstract-opdef-validating-gpuprogrammablestage
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/pull/4387
>>>>
>>>> Summary 
>>>>
>>>> WebGPU now allows developers to omit entry points to shader modules 
>>>> when creating a pipeline, improving ergonomics. If no default entry point 
>>>> is found, a GPUValidationError will be triggered as usual.
>>>>
>>>> Blink component 
>>>>
>>>> Blink>WebGPU 
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EWebGPU>
>>>>
>>>> TAG review 
>>>>
>>>> WebGPU spec: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/626
>>>>
>>>> TAG review status 
>>>>
>>>> A TAG review was not deemed necessary for this minor addition to the 
>>>> WebGPU spec, as it adheres to established conventions.
>>>>
>>>> Risks 
>>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>
>>>> Default entry points to shader modules have not yet been implemented in 
>>>> any browser, but have been approved by the GPU for the Web Community 
>>>> Group, 
>>>> with representatives from Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. See 
>>>> https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/wiki/GPU-Web-2023-11-08#default-entrypoints-to-shader-modules-4342-corentin-is-very-excited-about-this-tiny-addition
>>>>
>>>> Gecko: Positive (
>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/931)
>>>>
>>>> WebKit: Positive (
>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/284)
>>>>
>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Web developers: Positive. https://github.com/gpuweb/gpuweb/issues/4342
>>>>
>>>> Other signals:
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>
>>>> None at the moment, WebGPU currently does not ship on Android WebView.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>
>>>> No DevTools changes are required.
>>>>
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? 
>>>>
>>>> No
>>>>
>>>> All platforms will eventually have support. Will immediately be 
>>>> available on Android, ChromeOS, Mac, and Windows, since those platforms 
>>>> already support WebGPU. Linux is planned to have WebGPU support in the 
>>>> future, so this feature will become available when WebGPU does.
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ? 
>>>>
>>>> Work-in-progress.
>>>>
>>>> WebGPU/WGSL have a conformance test suite (
>>>> https://github.com/gpuweb/cts) that is regularly pulled into Chromium 
>>>> and part of the testing of Dawn/Tint in Chromium.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So does this addition have coverage in the WebGPU CTS? I went looking 
>>> through the CTS and WebGPU spec repo to try to understand the typical 
>>> working mode. I see 
>>> <https://github.com/gpuweb/cts#webgpu-conformance-test-suite> that the 
>>> test suite is considered normative and any mismatch between the CTS and 
>>> specs are bugs, so does that mean that spec changes are expected to 
>>> come along with 
>>> <https://github.com/foolip/testing-in-standards/blob/master/lifecycle.md> 
>>> test changes too (as is the practice in many other groups now)?
>>>
>>> Regardless, chromium's policy is that we expect conformance test 
>>> coverage (WPT or otherwise) for every I2S or an explanation of why such 
>>> test coverage isn't currently practical.
>>>
>>
>> I've just sent a CTS PR at https://github.com/gpuweb/cts/pull/3190 for 
>> this specific feature.
>>   
>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on chrome://flags 
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Finch feature name 
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Non-finch justification 
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Requires code in //chrome? 
>>>>
>>>> False
>>>>
>>>> Tracking bug 
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/dawn/issues/detail?id=2254
>>>>
>>>> Availability expectation 
>>>>
>>>> Feature is available only in Chromium browsers for the near future, on 
>>>> the order of months. Other browsers intend to ship WebGPU support, but 
>>>> don't have specified timelines.
>>>>
>>>> Non-OSS dependencies 
>>>>
>>>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
>>>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?
>>>>
>>>> No
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>
>>>> Shipping on desktop
>>>>
>>>> 121
>>>>
>>>> Shipping on Android
>>>>
>>>> 121
>>>>
>>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>>
>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>> of 
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5102870756327424
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPpwU5KPXpmcrMCz9keGzv88zFEeX_rgujaN63mr2aHe2nydFA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPpwU5KPXpmcrMCz9keGzv88zFEeX_rgujaN63mr2aHe2nydFA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_s-DapFcw63KpQbAnjwtc-LMPA1j3GaifVMNWnCXLEPg%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_s-DapFcw63KpQbAnjwtc-LMPA1j3GaifVMNWnCXLEPg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/98d58021-aa5a-4c71-821e-40ebd5ff4568n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to