On Thursday, November 30, 2023 at 3:34:53 AM UTC+1 Jeremy Roman wrote:
Contact emailsjbro...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://urlpattern.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlpattern- hasregexpgroups Summary Allows easy inspection of whether a URLPattern uses one or more ECMAScript regular expression groups, and therefore may not be suitable for use in cases where an ECMAScript engine is not available (such as some upcoming planned APIs). Strictly speaking this reflects back something developers could know anyway from inspecting the pattern, but having easy access to the UA's implementation of this check makes that more straightforward. Would the answer here be different between different implementations? Blink componentBlink>URLPattern <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EURLPattern> TAG reviewNone TAG review statusNot applicable Risks Interoperability and Compatibility Interoperability risk is low. The feature is simple, has a small API surface area, and is easy to implement. It could be polyfilled if other browser vendors implemented URLPattern but not this feature, though that outcome does not seem likely. *Gecko*: No signal (https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/# urlpattern) This addition is too trivial to request a separate position, but Mozilla is positive on URLPattern generally. *WebKit*: No signal (https://webkit.org/standards-positions/#position-61) This addition is too trivial to request a separate position, but WebKit is positive on URLPattern generally. *Web developers*: No signals No significant signals, but this feature is trivial *Other signals*: Ergonomics No significant concerns anticipated Activation No; in fact this property is added specifically to make activation of features which can only accept patterns with no regexp groups easier. Security No security risks have been identified. WebView application risks Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? None Debuggability Standard developer tools (e.g., the JavaScript console) are likely to be sufficient. If URL patterns become extremely popular one could imagine tools particular to them, but those could be developed independently of this ship decision. Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md> ?Yes https://wpt.fyi/results/urlpattern?label=master&label= experimental&aligned&q=urlpattern-hasregexpgroups Flag name on chrome://flagsNone Finch feature nameURLPatternHasRegExpGroups Requires code in //chrome?False Tracking bughttps://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1504650 Availability expectationDependent on implementation of URL Pattern API in non-Chromium browsers. Estimated milestonesShipping on desktop122Shipping on Android122Shipping on WebView122 If approvals arrive in time for 121 branch, I'll enable this in 121, but I'm currently assuming not. Anticipated spec changes Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of the API in a non-backward-compatible way). None Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Statushttps://chromestatus.com/ feature/4761338127843328 This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status <https://chromestatus.com/>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/dc7ac285-b990-42c9-a7cc-bcf3536be9d6n%40chromium.org.
