LGTM2 On 1/17/24 10:24 AM, Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote:
LGTM1On Friday, January 12, 2024 at 9:13:56 AM UTC+1 Nonoka Muraki wrote: spec PR was merged.(https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9933 <https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9933>) On Friday, January 12, 2024 at 12:41:31 AM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks Rakina - right now the biggest blocker is the unlanded spec PR. Things should move pretty quickly once that's resolved. On 1/10/24 11:15 PM, Rakina Zata Amni wrote:> Hoping that the design doc can become an GH explainer with the usual format, as the design doc doesn't answer questions in the strucutre we like to see Can you clarify which part isn't answered yet in the explainer <https://github.com/fergald/explainer-messageport-close/blob/main/README.md>? From the list in your link: * The user-facing problem which needs to be solved; o Covered by this section <https://github.com/fergald/explainer-messageport-close/blob/main/README.md#background>. * The proposed approach to solving the problem; o Covered by this section <https://github.com/fergald/explainer-messageport-close/blob/main/README.md#proposal>. * The way the proposed solution may be used in practice to address the intended use cases, via example code; o Pretty much covered by this section <https://github.com/fergald/explainer-messageport-close/blob/main/README.md#proposal> although there's no actual code example. We will add the code example (basically just an event listener using the close event) * Any other venues (such as mailing list, pull requests or issue threads external to the location of the explainer) where the reader may catch up on discussions regarding the proposed feature or features; o The issue <https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/1766> is linked from the explainer. * The alternatives which have already been considered and why they were not chosen; o Covered by this section <https://github.com/fergald/explainer-messageport-close/blob/main/README.md#alternatives-considered>. * Accessibility, security and privacy implications which have been considered as part of the design process. o Security & Privacy is covered by this sectio <https://github.com/fergald/explainer-messageport-close/blob/main/README.md#tag-security--privacy-questionnaire-answers>n, and there is no accessibility implication introduced by the new event. Please let us know if there are any parts that need further clarification. (BTW just to update the thread, the TAG review <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/923> has been requested last month) On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:49 AM Alex Russell <slightly...@chromium.org> wrote: +1 to Yoav's excitement about this. Thank you for pushing it forward. On TAG review, we're living in hope that the newly-expanded TAG will have more bandwidth and focus for reviews, but as Mike says, we're increasingly timing out. Filing for review at I2P time is always the pro-move, and I it's a bad look for us to be leaving it to late regardless. Hoping that the design doc can become an GH explainer with the usual format, as the design doc doesn't answer questions in the strucutre we like to see: https://w3ctag.org/explainers/ Best, Alex On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 8:46:20 AM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote: Gentle reminder to request approvals for the other review gates in chromestatus, thanks. On 12/1/23 1:05 PM, Mike Taylor wrote:On 11/30/23 10:56 PM, Fergal Daly wrote:On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 2:23:12 PM UTC+9 Yoav Weiss wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 12:31, Nonoka Muraki <murakinon...@chromium.org> wrote: TAG review Not needed because This is a small feature where we just dispatch a new event. Unfortunately that's not a criteria for skipping a TAG review. Can you file one? I'm concerned by this because every TAG review I've seen in the last couple of years has taken months to get a response. If our own privacy review is positive and we have agreement with other vendors would we block on the TAG review?In practice, we don't block on TAG reviews, but we like to give them a chance to review or comment within a reasonable time period (typically a week or two).
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/28299184-c2d1-4000-be13-f7489a5a242b%40chromium.org.
