Do you have any other questions? concerns? comments? There were many Intent to Ship/Experiment emails at the same time, and I am afraid this mail thread was overlooked.
2024年2月9日(金) 14:20 Yoshisato Yanagisawa <yyanagis...@chromium.org>: > > > 2024年2月9日(金) 13:20 Vladimir Levin <vmp...@chromium.org>: > >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024, 22:56 Yoshisato Yanagisawa <yyanagis...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Contact emails >>> >>> yyanagis...@chromium.org, sisidov...@chromium.org >>> >>> Explainer >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api >>> >>> Specification >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1701 >>> >>> Summary >>> >>> This API allows developers to configure the routing, and allows them to >>> offload simple things ServiceWorkers do. If the condition matches, the >>> navigation happens without starting ServiceWorkers or executing JavaScript, >>> which allows web pages to avoid performance penalties due to ServiceWorker >>> interceptions. >>> >>> >>> Blink component >>> >>> Blink>ServiceWorker >>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EServiceWorker> >>> >>> TAG review >>> >>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/863 >>> >>> TAG review status >>> >>> Issues addressed >>> >>> Chromium Trial Name >>> >>> ServiceWorkerStaticRouter >>> >>> Link to origin trial feedback summary >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mE3tngHQdz0s66Z_iIGksFxQui3taogP8pDafLUHMEg/edit#heading=h.ia9i7k1ocjnq >>> >> >> I just want to say that it's heartening to see OT feedback being taken >> seriously and addressed in rigorous manner. >> > > Thank you. > > >> >>> >>> Origin Trial documentation link >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api?tab=readme-ov-file#origin-trial >>> >>> Risks >>> >>> Interoperability and Compatibility >>> >>> Gecko: Positive ( >>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/828) >>> >>> WebKit: No signal ( >>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/206) Informal >>> positive signals at TPAC, but no official standards position. >>> >> >> It seems like the only concerns with this proposal (in TAG and elsewhere) >> was the status of URLPattern in the spec, but that has been since resolved. >> Is this your understanding as well? >> >> > Yes. I think we are on the same page. > As I have left a comment in the WebKit link, URLPattern has already become > the standard, and is actively maintained. > > >> >>> Web developers: Positive ( >>> https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1373) We see many positive >>> signals and feedback from developers on the Github issue and other places >>> (e.g. >>> https://jakearchibald.com/2019/service-worker-declarative-router/#disqus_thread). >>> Also, we have partners who participated in the OT (feedback >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mE3tngHQdz0s66Z_iIGksFxQui3taogP8pDafLUHMEg/edit#heading=h.ia9i7k1ocjnq> >>> ). >>> >>> Other signals: >>> >>> WebView application risks >>> >>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such >>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? >>> >>> Authors don’t foresee any obvious issue with WebView. WebView supports >>> ServiceWorkers, and any existing applications would not be affected unless >>> they opt-in to the static routing API explicitly. >>> >>> >>> Debuggability >>> >>> The registered router rules are visible via >>> chrome://serviceworker-internals and the DevTools application panel. The >>> matched rule can be seen in the size field of the DevTools network panel. >>> >>> >>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, >>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? >>> >>> Yes >>> >>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests >>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md> >>> ? >>> >>> Yes >>> >>> >>> https://wpt.fyi/results/service-workers/service-worker/tentative/static-router?label=master&label=experimental&aligned >>> >>> >>> https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/service-workers/service-worker/tentative/static-router/?q=service-workers%2Fservice-worker%2Ftentative%2Fstatic-router >>> >>> >>> Flag name on chrome://flags >>> >>> #service-worker-static-router >>> >>> Finch feature name >>> >>> ServiceWorkerStaticRouter >>> >>> Requires code in //chrome? >>> >>> False >>> >>> Tracking bug >>> >>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1371756 >>> >>> Launch bug >>> >>> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4261120 >>> >>> Measurement >>> >>> The number of partners who started to use the API in their production. >>> UKM's LCP and the partner's business metrics. UseCounter: >>> ServiceWorkerStaticRouter_AddRoutes and ServiceWorkerStaticRouter_Evaluate >>> >>> Availability expectation >>> >>> Feature will eventually be available on Web Platform mainline. The >>> URLPattern became the standard, and currently no concerns exist. >>> >>> Adoption expectation >>> >>> Feature is considered as a best practice to mitigate the ServiceWorker >>> performance issue on its cold start. Several internal/external partners >>> have already started trying the feature during the OT, and some of them see >>> performance improvement. They are expected to use the feature within 12 >>> months of launch in Chrome. >>> >>> Adoption plan >>> >>> We have already started the incubation process with several partners. We >>> intend to move them forward to help them launch. By using the results as >>> case studies, we intend to expand usage by helping libraries support the >>> API. >>> >>> Non-OSS dependencies >>> >>> Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open >>> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function? >>> >>> n/a >>> >>> Estimated milestones >>> >>> Shipping on desktop >>> >>> 123 >>> >>> OriginTrial desktop last >>> >>> 121 >>> >>> OriginTrial desktop first >>> >>> 116 >>> >>> Shipping on Android >>> >>> 123 >>> >>> OriginTrial Android last >>> >>> 121 >>> >>> OriginTrial Android first >>> >>> 116 >>> >>> OriginTrial webView last >>> >>> 121 >>> >>> OriginTrial webView first >>> >>> 116 >>> >>> >>> >>> Anticipated spec changes >>> >>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or >>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues >>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may >>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of >>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way). >>> >>> Limit the size of rules. >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api/issues/5 >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api/issues/6 >>> >>> If the limit is large enough to cover the relevant usages, it should not >>> be a source of issues. >>> >>> Timing Info >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api/issues/19 >>> >>> The timing info for the API will be decided in a backward-compatible >>> way. It should not be a source of issues. >>> >>> Making subsequent subresource request uses the navigation request’s >>> source >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api/issues/7 >>> >>> This can be implemented as another condition, and should not break >>> backward compatibility. >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/WICG/service-worker-static-routing-api/blob/main/final-form.md >>> >>> tells conditions and sources that can be added in the future. The time >>> condition and conditional syntaxes are not implemented yet. Also, some >>> sources are considered to have fields. However, they should come as new >>> conditions / sources, it should not break backward compatibility. >>> >>> >>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status >>> >>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5185352976826368 >>> >>> Links to previous Intent discussions >>> >>> Intent to prototype: >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/fyvsde2ay2A/m/RH9E8hB0AgAJ >>> Intent to Experiment: >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAGMyg-abNsH2mfBw3%2BiaJgMn3SKCEzBzw0FuMudbmQ9XhkjEVg%40mail.gmail.com >>> >>> Intent to Extend Experiment: >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gTy-fpBOXDM >>> >>> Intent to Ship: >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/gTy-fpBOXDM >>> >>> >>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status >>> <https://chromestatus.com/>. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "blink-dev" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPNB-6WZdPweNTAvcG4k3kuB9EzV2AbGVme4Byxzg%2BRKganb2Q%40mail.gmail.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPNB-6WZdPweNTAvcG4k3kuB9EzV2AbGVme4Byxzg%2BRKganb2Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPNB-6XPVmcMvKV1_wmjG9%2B6sTZ8RabDOJK6dPk7xR20TmvrXQ%40mail.gmail.com.
