Hello Mike,

Thank you for taking a look!

I am seeking consensus on how to approach the feature from a 
standardization perspective. I think the feature can be considered a 
browser UI change, which is why I haven't requested a TAG review or signals 
from other engines. However, I am open to doing so if necessary.

I apologize for any confusion. We did the general experimentation in Edge 
(not the "origin trials" as I mentioned in the email). Retention reports 
were neutral, and we observed no regressions in scorecards. Also, we have 
not received any negative user feedback thus far.

I am working on requesting reviews for my chromestatus entry. Thanks for 
pointing this out!

Thanks,
Yaroslav

On Friday, March 1, 2024 at 5:52:55 AM UTC-8 mike...@chromium.org wrote:

> Hi there,
>
>
> Would you mind requesting reviews for the various review gates in your 
> chromestatus entry?
>
>
> On 2/29/24 4:12 PM, 'Yaroslav Shalivskyy' via blink-dev wrote:
>
> Contact emails 
> gerc...@microsoft.com, yshal...@microsoft.com
>
> Explainer 
> None
>
> Specification 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/css-color-adjust-1
>
> Summary 
>
> Makes the browser use the user's preferred color scheme to render the 
> viewport scrollbars if the value of "page’s supported color schemes" is 
> 'normal' or not specified, and the computed value of the color-scheme for 
> the root element is 'normal'. Viewport scrollbars can be considered to be 
> outside the web content. Therefore, the user agents should honor the user's 
> preferred color scheme when rendering viewport scrollbars if page authors 
> have not explicitly specified support for color schemes.
>
>
> Blink component 
> Blink>Layout>Scrollbars 
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ELayout%3EScrollbars>
>
> TAG review 
> None
>
> TAG review status 
> Not applicable
>
> Any reason you think this is N/A, or have you just not requested TAG 
> review?
>
>
> Risks 
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>
> None
>
>
> *Gecko*: No signal
>
> *WebKit*: No signal
>
> *Web developers*: No signals
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> Could we request signals please?
>
>
> WebView application risks 
>
> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that 
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>
> None
>
>
> Debuggability 
>
> None
>
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac, 
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? 
> Yes
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ? 
> No
>
> Flag name on chrome://flags 
> None
>
> Finch feature name 
> UsedColorSchemeRootScrollbars
>
> Requires code in //chrome? 
> False
>
> Tracking bug 
> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40259909
>
> Measurement 
> Added a use counter UsedColorSchemeRootScrollbarsDark. The counter tracks 
> the number of users who have dark mode root scrollbars due to the feature. 
> Adoption in Edge Stable population based on this metric is approximately 
> 13%.
>
> Availability expectation 
> Initially available in Chromium browsers.
>
> Adoption expectation 
> This feature immediately affects specific use cases upon launch.
>
> Adoption plan 
> This feature has been through origin trials on Edge. Other browsers adopt 
> this feature to fix specific use cases.
>
> Any details or feedback you can share from the Origin Trial?
>
>
> Non-OSS dependencies 
>
> *Does the feature depend on any code or APIs outside the Chromium open 
> source repository and its open-source dependencies to function?*
> No.
>
> Estimated milestones 
>
> Shipping on desktop
> 124
> DevTrial on desktop
> 121
>
>
> Anticipated spec changes 
>
> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of 
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
> None
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5089486318075904
>
> Links to previous Intent discussions 
> Intent to prototype: 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/PH8PR00MB16366CA3D32D8ECE2C646C54A94D2%40PH8PR00MB1636.namprd00.prod.outlook.com
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/LV3PR00MB17488611D88C9E41AC6A806BA95F2%40LV3PR00MB1748.namprd00.prod.outlook.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/LV3PR00MB17488611D88C9E41AC6A806BA95F2%40LV3PR00MB1748.namprd00.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/34e66337-a227-4521-93bc-42317a1659b4n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to