On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 10:31, Yoav Weiss <yoav.we...@shopify.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 25, 2025 at 5:12:17 AM UTC-4 Jake Archibald wrote: > > This issue wouldn't happen if any of the following was done instead: > > > - Each element was assigned a unique view-transition-name ident > - view-transition-name: match-element was used. It doesn't do anything > with the ID attribute. > - Each element was given a unique data-vtn attribute, and > view-transition-name: attr(data-vtn type(<custom-ident>)) - this is ok > because it isn't overloading an existing attribute with new behaviours, and > developers can easily search the codebase for data-vtn to see how it's > used. > > Were any of these alternatives considered? > To be clear, all of those are already possible. Developers just have to use one of those options rather than `view-transition-name: auto`. The existence of `view-transition-name: auto` misdirects them to a solution that will give them tricky problems later. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJ5xic_4Xxtr1S6Q%3Dh76d6QYrRRdHwhgrcTm5BwohygNuxLQUw%40mail.gmail.com.
