I've summarised the issues with this proposal in the TAG thread
<https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1001#issuecomment-2750966335>
.

On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 10:44, Noam Rosenthal <nrosent...@chromium.org>
wrote:

>
>>
>> *Until this feature (correct me if I'm wrong), adding a unique ID to an
>> element was safe. With this feature, that's no longer the case.*
>>
>>
>> This seems like a worthwhile question to bring back to the TAG and/or the
>> CSSWG. Looking at the TAG review, it doesn't seem like it was discussed.
>>
>
> Happy to take this back to TAG, but would defer to Vlad for next steps.
> Not counting on this leading to anything actionable though as Apple were
> very adamant about keeping things as is in the last few discussions about
> this,
> following the CSSWG process that things can stay in the spec unless there
> is a consensus to remove them.
>
> This should 100% *not* be the reasoning for shipping a feature we think
>> is bad.
>>
>
> If API owners think that this is "bad" then we definitely shouldn't ship
> it, or ship only match-element which everyone seems to agree on.
> I would describe this as "not ideal" and that keeping interop on this is
> the lesser evil.
>
>
>> Are we seeing real-life interop pressure? How many sites are already
>> using `auto`? What's the user experience in Chromium for ones that do?
>>
>
> It's not an existing backwards compat issue. But we'd be introducing a
> slight inconsistency from the get go which IMO is arguably worse than
> shipping the whole thing.
> As a web developer I'd probably end up being confused by this whole thing
> if Webkit and chromium end up shipping something slightly different with a
> lack of consensus attached to it.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJ5xic-B2RhUR4K0RW3huz_pcT6DUpEVoJpcHDYEKbPvyTEL2A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to