Hi Dan,

Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Addressing your points:

*Design Doc Access:* The original document contains some internal
information that can't be shared. I've created a public version of the
design document that you can access here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CBH4r6rxSryY28hOhBQC-DZgjwWbO-FRYg_bbJIfBFo

*TAG Review:* Given the relatively small scope of this API addition, I
initially didn't think a TAG review was necessary. However, I'm happy to
request one if you think it would be beneficial.

*Gecko Position:* We've been working closely with Mozilla on this design (
pade...@mozilla.com is a collaborator on the spec change
<https://github.com/WebAudio/web-speech-api/pull/145>). I can ask him to
add a formal position to the thread to make it official.

*WebKit Feedback & WPT Coverage:* Thanks for the suggestion. I've just
updated the WebKit thread to reflect the latest changes.

Regarding test coverage, the end-to-end tests are currently manual because
the test environment has limitations in accessing the necessary on-device
models. I'll look into ways to improve our automated test coverage and will
add more tests for edge cases and error handling.

Thanks,

Evan
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 5:12 PM Daniel Clark <dan...@microsoft.com> wrote:

> > Design docs
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AW9DxKYNfnt_wruxmd-_M1islS-MgsUVpaNBen-XvHk
> I don’t have access to this document. Could it be made available to
> non-Googlers?
>
> *> TAG review*
> > None
>
> Can you say why no TAG review?
>
> > *Gecko*: Positive (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1255)
>
> I don’t see Gecko taking any position on that thread.
>
> > *WebKit*: No signal (
> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/517)
>
> Thanks for engaging with Marcos’ feedback on the WebKit thread. It looks
> like most of his feedback has now been addressed, so you might consider
> sending a ping giving that update, with the context that you’re now
> requesting this to ship in Chromium.
>
> *> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?*
> > Yes
> >
> https://wpt.fyi/results/speech-api?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>
> I couldn’t find much test coverage at this link for this addition -- just
> the one line in
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/speech-api/SpeechRecognition-basics.https.html
>  that
> confirms the phrases array exists and is initially empty. I did see there
> was an end-to-end manual test at
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/speech-api/SpeechRecognition-phrases-manual.https.html
>  which
> is great. Maybe there’s more that can be added as automated coverage
> though? For example an automated WPT could check that
> SpeechRecognitionPhrases can be constructed, that they can be assigned to
> phrases, that boost values outside of the 0.0-10.0 range throw errors,
> etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> *From: *blink-dev@chromium.org <blink-dev@chromium.org> on behalf of
> Chromestatus <ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 9, 2025 at 11:13 AM
> *To: *blink-dev@chromium.org <blink-dev@chromium.org>
> *Cc: *ev...@google.com <ev...@google.com>, y...@google.com <y...@google.com>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Web Speech API
> contextual biasing
>
> Contact emails
> y...@google.com, ev...@google.com
>
> Explainer
>
> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-speech-api/blob/main/explainers/contextual-biasing.md
>
> Specification
> https://webaudio.github.io/web-speech-api/#speechreco-phraselist
>
> Design docs
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AW9DxKYNfnt_wruxmd-_M1islS-MgsUVpaNBen-XvHk
>
> Summary
>
> This feature enables websites to support contextual biasing for speech
> recognition by adding a recognition phrase list to the Web Speech API.
> Developers can provide a list of phrases as well as updating them to apply
> a bias to the speech recognition models in favor of those phrases. This
> helps improve accuracy and relevance for domain-specific and personalized
> speech recognition.
>
>
> Blink component
> Blink>Speech
> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ESpeech%22>
>
> Search tags
> speech <http:///features#tags:speech>, recognition
> <http:///features#tags:recognition>, local <http:///features#tags:local>,
> offline <http:///features#tags:offline>, on-device
> <http:///features#tags:on-device>, contextual
> <http:///features#tags:contextual>, biasing
> <http:///features#tags:biasing>
>
> TAG review
> None
>
> TAG review status
> Pending
>
> Risks
>
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
> None
>
>
> *Gecko*: Positive (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1255)
>
> *WebKit*: No signal (
> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/517)
>
> *Web developers*: No signals
>
> *Other signals*:
>
> WebView application risks
>
> *Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?*
>
> None
>
>
> Debuggability
>
> None
>
>
> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
> No
>
> Initially supported on Windows, Mac, and Linux with ChromeOS support to
> follow.
>
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?
> Yes
>
> https://wpt.fyi/results/speech-api?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>
>
> Flag name on about://flags
>
>
> Finch feature name
> WebSpeechRecognitionContext,OnDeviceWebSpeech,OnDeviceWebSpeechAvailable
>
> Rollout plan
> Will ship enabled for all users
>
> Requires code in //chrome?
> False
>
> Estimated milestones
>
> Shipping on desktop
> 140
>
>
> Anticipated spec changes
>
> *Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).*
> None
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5225615177023488?gate=4780829605363712
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/686eb087.2b0a0220.3a1521.0f8f.GAE%40google.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/686eb087.2b0a0220.3a1521.0f8f.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOVsCZn7V0aePzGvVRV6eYdLs0AO3J7NXahFS9WkyErHbh_6sA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to