LGTM3

On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 8:55 PM Domenic Denicola <dome...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> LGTM2!
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 5:33 AM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Perfect, thanks Mason. LGTM1 then.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 8:42 PM Mason Freed <mas...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 3:08 PM Rick Byers <rby...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>>
>>>>> Use counters are relatively high:
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4272
>>>>> However, analysis from Mozilla shows that perhaps the impact is not as
>>>>> large as the use counters would suggest:
>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7867#issuecomment-2595987424
>>>>> Firefox has now shipped the complete removal of this behavior for two
>>>>> milestones with no reported issues.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tend to agree this should be low risk. In particular I assume the
>>>> "severity of breakage" is very low here (worst case some text is just a bit
>>>> bigger) and "ease of mitigation" is very high, right? The accessibility and
>>>> interoperability gains make this worth trying and accepting a bit of compat
>>>> pain for, but I am a little worried we may find eg. some enterprise / LOB
>>>> app which has an unacceptable UI regression. So I'm supportive as long as
>>>> we've got a plan to flag off if needed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. I think that's right - the change is just different margins and
>>> font sizes (by a little) and the fix is to add explicit `font-size` and
>>> `margin` CSS rules to get the sizes the site wants.
>>>
>>> The plan is certainly to have a kill switch in case problems are
>>> encountered. I'm leaning heavily on Mozilla's work here - they did some
>>> http archive research (showing only minor impact) and they've shipped it
>>> and heard crickets.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ?
>>>>> Yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/html/rendering/non-replaced-elements/sections-and-headings
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nice. Do we match Firefox at 100% passing when we ship this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yep
>>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6725454/2/third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/html/rendering/non-replaced-elements/sections-and-headings/headings-styles-no-h1-in-section.tentative-expected.txt>
>>> !
>>>
>>>
>>>> Finch feature nameNone
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This needs a kill switch flag, right? Just in case of an emergency web
>>>> compat issue?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I'm still landing the flag, but I'll update the chromestatus when
>>> it's ready. Tentative name (not yet landed) is
>>> `SpecialRulesForNestedH1Elements`.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-finch justificationNone
>>>>>
>>>>> Rollout planWill ship enabled for all users
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>>
>>>>> Tracking bughttps://issues.chromium.org/issues/394111284
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>> Shipping on desktop 140
>>>>> DevTrial on desktop 136
>>>>> Shipping on Android 140
>>>>> DevTrial on Android 136
>>>>> Shipping on WebView 140
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6192419898654720?gate=4740512881573888
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>> To view this discussion visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM%3DNeDga_GXVFf6fjoNQ7Y3w5xDDT5U0m75fGYEgnCEV4B2i%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM%3DNeDga_GXVFf6fjoNQ7Y3w5xDDT5U0m75fGYEgnCEV4B2i%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY8wQZzw6UrRPcpKRN7gav8LWr8hdwC6wL43MgKMN_FQ4Q%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY8wQZzw6UrRPcpKRN7gav8LWr8hdwC6wL43MgKMN_FQ4Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra9CveVtGMiAztaTU1PSpnaOVEzybumX%3DHTvGVg4B4Rg-Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra9CveVtGMiAztaTU1PSpnaOVEzybumX%3DHTvGVg4B4Rg-Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw-o%2BCU1BcGu%3D56ZwBHH-7crm%2B-Dt1pe10p1i_mjS-LSLA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to