LGTM3

On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 5:22 PM Rick Byers <[email protected]> wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> Sounds like there might be some ongoing debate around the privacy vs.
> utility tradeoff but I'm happy to see this ship and continue to iterate if
> needed.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:12 AM Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 10:52 AM Chromestatus <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *Contact emails*
>>> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
>>>
>>> *Explainer*
>>>
>>> https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/PerformanceNavigationTiming%20for%20User%20Agent%20Launch/explainer.md
>>>
>>> *Specification*
>>>
>>> https://w3c.github.io/navigation-timing/#sec-performance-timing-confidence
>>>
>>> *Design docs*
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D6DqptsCEd3wPRsZ0q1iwVBAXXmhxZuLV-KKFI0ptCg/edit#heading=h.7nki9mck5t64
>>>
>>> *Summary*
>>> Web applications may suffer from bimodal distribution in page load
>>> performance due to factors outside of the application’s control. For
>>> example, when a user agent first launches in a “cold start” scenario, it
>>> must perform many expensive initialization tasks that compete for system
>>> resources. Browser extensions can also affect performance, since some
>>> extensions run additional code on every page you visit, increasing CPU
>>> usage and slowing response times. Likewise, when a machine is already busy
>>> with intensive tasks, web pages may load more slowly as a result. In these
>>> scenarios, content the web app attempts to load will be in competition with
>>> other work happening on the system. This makes it difficult to detect if
>>> performance issues exist within web applications themselves, or because of
>>> external factors. Teams we have worked with have been surprised at the
>>> difference between real-world dashboard metrics and what they observe in
>>> page profiling tools. Without more information, it is challenging for
>>> developers to understand if (and when) their applications may be
>>> misbehaving or are simply being loaded in a contended period. A new
>>> ‘confidence’ field on the PerformanceNavigationTiming object will enable
>>> developers to discern if the navigation timings are representative for
>>> their web application.
>>>
>>> *Blink component*
>>> Blink>PerformanceAPIs>NavigationTiming
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EPerformanceAPIs%3ENavigationTiming%22>
>>>
>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>> Missing feature
>>>
>>> *Motivation*
>>> When a user agent first launches (a "cold start" scenario), it must
>>> perform many expensive initialization tasks that compete for resources on
>>> the system. Consequently, web applications may suffer from bimodal
>>> distribution in page load performance. Content they attempt to load will be
>>> in competition with other initialization work. This makes it difficult to
>>> detect if performance issues exist within web applications themselves, or
>>> because of a user-agent-generated condition of high resource contention.
>>> This is particularly a pain point for pinned PWAs (Progressive Web Apps)
>>> that will often require a cold start of the user agent, and teams we have
>>> worked with have been surprised at the difference between real-world
>>> dashboard metrics and what they observe in page profiling tools. Without
>>> more information, it is challenging for developers to understand if (and
>>> when) their applications may be misbehaving or are simply being loaded in a
>>> contended period. To address this, we propose adding new information to
>>> existing Web Performance APIs.
>>>
>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>
>>> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-user-agent-launch-type-in-performancenavigationtiming/5875
>>>
>>> *TAG review*
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/878
>>>
>>> *TAG review status*
>>> Issues addressed
>>>
>>> *Origin Trial Name*
>>> PerformanceNavigationTiming confidence
>>>
>>> *Chromium Trial Name*
>>> PerformanceNavigationTimingConfidence
>>>
>>> *Origin Trial documentation link*
>>>
>>> https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/PerformanceNavigationTiming%20for%20User%20Agent%20Launch/explainer.md
>>>
>>> *WebFeature UseCounter name*
>>> kPerformanceNavigationTimingConfidence
>>>
>>> *Risks*
>>>
>>>
>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>> None.
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1191)
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/469)
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40255844#comment10) Positive
>>> feedback from WebPerfWG.
>>> https://w3c.github.io/web-performance/meetings/2025/2025-11-TPAC/index.html#h.jgi0mlvusons
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>>
>>> *Debuggability*
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>> Yes
>>>
>>> third_party/blink/web_tests/http/tests/misc/performance-navigation-timing-entry-confidence.tentative.html
>>>
>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *Finch feature name*
>>> PerformanceNavigationTimingConfidence
>>>
>>> *Rollout plan*
>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>
>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>> True
>>>
>>> *Tracking bug*
>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1413848
>>>
>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>> Shipping on desktop 145
>>> Origin trial desktop first 136
>>> Origin trial desktop last 139
>>> Origin trial extension 1 end milestone 142
>>> DevTrial on desktop 135
>>> Shipping on Android 145
>>> Origin trial Android first 136
>>> Origin trial Android last 139
>>> DevTrial on Android 135
>>> Shipping on WebView 145
>>>
>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> *No information provided*
>>>
>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5186950448283648?gate=6507865714458624
>>>
>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/o0F7nBKsgg0/m/bJSp3ekfAAAJ
>>> Intent to Experiment:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/FYsfp0OsMko/m/WbhUrqSqAQAJ
>>> Intent to Extend Experiment 1:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6091e78f-7c77-4ed3-9559-eb660a14dfb7n%40chromium.org
>>>
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6939c150.710a0220.1d2509.07c8.GAE%40google.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6939c150.710a0220.1d2509.07c8.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw8XAjvGyfSt%3DJ4%3D4OMtPG5s%3DWqzTmwju0xn6s58e0tnpg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw8XAjvGyfSt%3DJ4%3D4OMtPG5s%3DWqzTmwju0xn6s58e0tnpg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_q%3Dx86iLt-BxLahVO%2BrMuu0SkUGEt1RDvUxC2nxs4VUQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_q%3Dx86iLt-BxLahVO%2BrMuu0SkUGEt1RDvUxC2nxs4VUQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohS%2BT-pTO_n1S5JKsmGzR4CJpDPpv2gyHM2J32OCSJq8u0g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to