Hi, John.  I love that last bit!

And yeah, I agree, if I understand you right, that we should try to be our best, individually and collectively.

AlOn 04/26/2017 09:08 AM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
It's not really your fault, Al. It's mine. I'll admit that this thing
about each and every person thinking they have all the answers is
ubiquitous in the human race. Like I always say, I can't stand people
who think they know everything, that is really annoying to those of us
who actually do know everything.  But lets not settle for average. Just
because everybody does it, that doesn't mean we have to. If sighted
people were jumping off a bridge, would you jump off a bridge?

PS: My dad used that bridge line on me one time when I was a kid. I
said, "I don't know. I'd have to guess there would be some reason they
are jumping off a bridge. It depends on what that reason was."

-- John Heim



On 04/25/2017 09:30 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:


Sometimes being inflexible is a good thing, sometimes a bad one.  It's
often but not always easy to know when to do which.  Some NFB rehab
centers have been more sensible than others in this department.

I'm normally a guide dog user, but when I use a cane, the NFB straight
cane is for me the best by far most of the time.  I also use a folding
cane from time to time, however, and probably should get one of those
with the ball tip.

Then again, maybe I shouldn't have said any of this.  This has arisen,
sadly, because I followed up a comment complaining about their being two
advocacy organizations of the blind by naming twhat I presume to be the
two he had in mind.  My point had to do with our predictable diversity
of needs and viewpoints and useful versus dubious forms of unity.  I
guess I should have figured things would veer off into whether one or
both organizations suck, but it didn't occur to me.  I probably should
have stuck to guzzling coffee and studying assembly.  (another grimace)

Al On 04/25/2017 08:18 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:
yeah, they kept trying to make me use "their" brand of cane. One small
problem, the tips would wear out too fast. Another problem, the
fastening screw would fall out.

Somehow, I think their idea of a cane is simply a brand one. Sure, its
lightweight, but its also a bit too flexible. It also doesn't work
well in areas where sidewalks are broken. It most decidedly doesn't
work in snow. Basically, I had my O&M instructor try to navigate a
snow packed sidewalk with the NFB cane. Then I had him try it with my
folding cane with the large ball tip. He kept insisting that I use the
NFB model, but had to admit that it just wasn't practical to use in
all circumstances. So, I take it as a valid assumption that the
leadership is inflexible at the best of times. I know for a fact that
a lot of their instructors are very inflexible unless presented with
facts they can't ignore.

-eric

On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Linux for blind general discussion wrote:

NFB members at a training center alienated me through their rigid
insistence on straight canes and failure to account for the
multiply-disabled or congenitally blind in training methods. I also
couldn't stomach their idea that I should run all my words and actions
through the "how does this make all blind people look" filter, or that
becoming normal should be my ultimate goal. Several of us in here
would have to lose a bunch of IQ points to be considered normal. And,
I hate the Borg.

That was over a decade ago. I'm on some of their mailing lists and I
have some of their folding) canes since those are useful things. I
won't join, but I've met some interesting individual members.

On 4/25/17, Linux for blind general discussion
<blinux-list@redhat.com> wrote:
The ACB's lawsuit against the U.S. Department of the Treasury to make
them make money accessible was already flawed to say the least.
According to the United States Constitution, the power to design money
has been delegated to Congress, and the Department of the Treasury is
only responsible for carrying out the orders of Congress. Therefore,
the
best way to make money accessible would have been for any and all
so-called advocacy organizations to lobby Congress and get a bill
passed
and signed by the President of the United States that would redesign
our
money in an accessible way. Do I think the ACB's lawsuit was a
publicity
stunt? Absolutely, as if they wanted us to have accessible money for
sure, they would have gone through the proper channels and we would
have
had it by now. Instead, where are we? No closer to truly accessible
currency than we were when this whole sleighride begen nearly 10 years
ago. Thank you, ACB and NFB for being such advocates for the needs of
blind and visually impaired citizens of the United States. Without
your
petty bickering and your "We're not them" attitudes, the world would
certainly be a better and more friendly place for all of us.

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list


_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

Reply via email to