> It's actually remarkably un-bloated... I have seen a number of remarkably unbloated comcast tests including this one at gigabit symmetric:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/348305 which I know is someone testing their future products. Unfortunately I have no visibility as to the hardware in use in each test, and should really ask when such a result floats past. Put up a big box begging them to fill out a little survey. On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > > justin: >> >> thx for nuking the log scale. that makes the bloat much more visible >> here (typical cablemodem) >> >> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322800 >> >> I am puzzled as to my post fq_codel result here at T+40 and will have >> to repeat... >> >> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322992 >> > > This is my DOCSIS3 250/50 connection: > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/349547 > > During the evenings (as it was when I tested now) I seem to not get over > 100-150 megabit/s downstream, indicating it's saturating on the coax > segment at peak usage. I should probably get a newer modem, mine is a few > years old. > > It's actually remarkably un-bloated... > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat >
_______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
